Quizzes & Puzzles22 mins ago
Should migrants earn their benefits?
13 Answers
http://www.dailymail....nefits-takes-BNP.html
Why has she took so long to come up with this?
Couldn't be that Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP is standing against her in the 2010 General Election, could it?.
Interesting to note she herself is an immigrant,
Wikipedia:
/// Margaret Hodge was born in Egypt as Margaret Oppenheimer, the daughter of a refugee millionaire German Jewish steel trader and his Austrian Jewish wife, Hans and Lisbeth Oppenheimer.[2][3] After World War II, her family settled in London.///
Why has she took so long to come up with this?
Couldn't be that Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP is standing against her in the 2010 General Election, could it?.
Interesting to note she herself is an immigrant,
Wikipedia:
/// Margaret Hodge was born in Egypt as Margaret Oppenheimer, the daughter of a refugee millionaire German Jewish steel trader and his Austrian Jewish wife, Hans and Lisbeth Oppenheimer.[2][3] After World War II, her family settled in London.///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
// Couldn't be that Nick Griffin, leader of the BNP is standing against her in the 2010 General Election, could it?. //
Barking has a large immigrant population and is unlikely to vote for the BNP. Margaret Hodge has a large majority, more than twice her nearest rival. The BNP is standing in her seat (and the others they have targeted) not because they have any chance of winning, but because they have high profile Government Ministers in them.
Do you seriously think a Labour politician would tailor their policies because they had a BNP candidate standing against them?
Barking has a large immigrant population and is unlikely to vote for the BNP. Margaret Hodge has a large majority, more than twice her nearest rival. The BNP is standing in her seat (and the others they have targeted) not because they have any chance of winning, but because they have high profile Government Ministers in them.
Do you seriously think a Labour politician would tailor their policies because they had a BNP candidate standing against them?
http://www.guardian.c...y/20/comment.politics
Reading this article dated May 2007, I think she has the problem well covered, the problem being is would her thoughts ever be put into practice?
/// Industry Minister Margaret Hodge argues that newcomers' rights cannot come before those born here.///
/// In April 2006 she commented in an interview with The Sunday Telegraph that eight out of ten white working class voters in her constituency may be tempted to vote for the British National Party (BNP) in the local elections on 4 May 2006 because "no one else is listening to them" ///
Reading this article dated May 2007, I think she has the problem well covered, the problem being is would her thoughts ever be put into practice?
/// Industry Minister Margaret Hodge argues that newcomers' rights cannot come before those born here.///
/// In April 2006 she commented in an interview with The Sunday Telegraph that eight out of ten white working class voters in her constituency may be tempted to vote for the British National Party (BNP) in the local elections on 4 May 2006 because "no one else is listening to them" ///
/// eight out of ten white working class voters in her constituency may be tempted to vote for the British National Party (BNP) in the local elections on 4 May 2006 ///
Reality check AOG: This is what actually happened on 4 May 2006
The Labour Party retained control of the council winning 39 seats and 56% of the popular vote. The BNP won 11 seats and formed the official oppostion winning 14% of the popular vote. The Conservatives won 1 seat.
Reality check AOG: This is what actually happened on 4 May 2006
The Labour Party retained control of the council winning 39 seats and 56% of the popular vote. The BNP won 11 seats and formed the official oppostion winning 14% of the popular vote. The Conservatives won 1 seat.
>Migrants would be forced to 'earn' the right to benefits and council housing over >several years under explosive plans outlined today by a senior Labour minister.
Labour have been in power for years, and been "in charge" of the most lax immigration policy EVER, that will ruin this country for decades.
And NOW, just before an election, they realise that immigration MAY be a vote loser for them.
They really are pathetic.
Labour have been in power for years, and been "in charge" of the most lax immigration policy EVER, that will ruin this country for decades.
And NOW, just before an election, they realise that immigration MAY be a vote loser for them.
They really are pathetic.
I tend to agree with another-view that you should only be able to take from a system you have contributed to. I know there are always going to be exceptions but there aren't many people on benefits who would be incapable of doing something for the community. That applies as much to white anglo-saxons whose family has lived here for generations as recent immigrants.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.