Why are pundits always so blinded by results?

mariner2 | 05:37 Thu 04th Mar 2010 | Football

3 Answers

England's game last night . . . "game of two halves" . . . "massive improvement" . . . "what did the manger say at half time?". . . .
Because we were 1-0 down at half time we were dire, but we were brilliant in the second half because we scored three.
In the game I was was watching, it was a pretty good performance over the 90 minutes, but we just happened to miss some clear cut chances in the first half, but not in the second.

prev

Capello's ethics

next

World Cup Diary

Answers

1 to 3 of 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mariner2. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

-- answer removed --

It didn't fit mine either Steve. I had them down for a 2-1 win at the bookies!

brionon

Mariner I agree there were several good chances in the 1st half and I thought we played well.

1 to 3 of 3

Do you know the answer?

Why are pundits always so blinded by results?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.