ChatterBank1 min ago
9 year old hit by a car
19 Answers
hi, a friend of mine with a 9 year old kid crossed the street but were not in the zebra lane (or whatever you call it). the kid crossed the street first then she followed, unfortunately, the kid was hit by a fast moving car. luckily, the kid survived with minor injuries. who will be liable?
Answers
taken from
http:// www. direct. gov... Highwaycode/ DG_ 070108
09:25 Mon 08th Mar 2010
Crossings
18
At all crossings. When using any type of crossing you should
always check that the traffic has stopped before you start to cross or push a pram onto a crossing
always cross between the studs or over the zebra markings. Do not cross at the side of the crossing or on the zig-zag lines, as it can be dangerous
18
At all crossings. When using any type of crossing you should
always check that the traffic has stopped before you start to cross or push a pram onto a crossing
always cross between the studs or over the zebra markings. Do not cross at the side of the crossing or on the zig-zag lines, as it can be dangerous
This happened to me about 2 yrs ago , a child ran straight out , between parked cars , in front of me and I hit him .Was only travelling at 20 mph in an area full of parked cars and a school releasing children at the end of the day.He was not badly hurt fortunately.Police involved decided it was not my fault, but that it was his fault.,.
It will. be different in your case if the car was speeding.
It will. be different in your case if the car was speeding.
but they crossed the street with no pedestrian markings...the child crossed the street first and ran so my adult friend followed the kid. then the kid was hit by a car. the kid was literally thrown away so we assumed the car was speeding. will the parents or the adult accompanying the child will be charged by the police in case the police proved that it's the 9 year old child's fault?
30 mph is pretty damned fast when you are virtually stationary in the middle of the road.
I am not sure what the police would be able to charge the adult/parents with if the driver is found to be not at fault.
All that could happen is that the driver might claim for any damage his car may have sustained.
I am not sure what the police would be able to charge the adult/parents with if the driver is found to be not at fault.
All that could happen is that the driver might claim for any damage his car may have sustained.
-- answer removed --
Sorry, Eddie, we still have this 'innocent until proven guilty' nonsense in the UK, so the driver isn't presumed to be at fault. No one is, until the incident has been investigated.
Drivers must exercise due care and attention, but that responsibilty also falls on pedestrians and those looking after children.
If anyone is injured in an accident involving a motor vehicle, the police must be informed.
Drivers must exercise due care and attention, but that responsibilty also falls on pedestrians and those looking after children.
If anyone is injured in an accident involving a motor vehicle, the police must be informed.
it is foolish to assume that the car was speeding just because the child was thrown a distance from the impact... If the car was not speeding... what action could the driver have taken to avoid this accident? You state the child ran into the road.... sounds like the childs fault...
Hope the car wasnt too damaged!
Hope the car wasnt too damaged!
she's been staying there for almost 2 months now for study. they are still waiting for the cctv review up to now. the child is already 9 years old. is it a law in london that a child at that age should always be accompanied by an adult when going to school even if his house is just 3 blocks away? if not, at what age is he permitted to go to school by himself?