<If we spell out the real truth that B&B did not want those homos performing in their bed and neither would most people. The law is an ass in forcing people to condone it>
It is NOT forcing anyone to 'condone' anal sex. It's asking you to tolerate people who are gay/bisexual - which is a very different thing (if you say you 'tolerate' someone, that doesn't mean you necessarily like them, does it?) B&Bs can't function in they way they used to - they're businesses and you can no longer just turn people away because you've got some kind of obsessive paranoia about them having sex.
Should we really base our laws on this childish mentality that thinks 'BUM SEX' whenever anyone says 'gay'? As opposed to the pragmatic idea that everyone should put up just a little bit with other members of society?
I'm going to copy-paste something I wrote on the other thread, because I think it applies here (and because I can't be bothered to write it again):
"That's not some kind of air-headed ideological imposition - it's just realism. It's the only way a diverse and pluralistic society can possibly work in the modern world - everyone grudges a little compromise to receive it in kind. I can't throw a brick at certain members of my Union, and this woman can't discriminate against sections of the population whenever she likes. "