ChatterBank3 mins ago
Idi-Amin's son charged.
11 Answers
http://www.telegraph....migration-centre.html
Is this a set-up to prevent this lump of scum from being deported?
Wangita, who is unemployed, came to England as a young child with his mother, anyone know why he is being deported?
The South American victim, suffered multiple injuries and spent three nights in hospital following the attack, he will also not be deported now owing to him giving evidence at the trial.
Keeping Wangita and the others in custody will cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds, and the bill will rise even further, if they are convicted and jailed.
If you Invite the scum of the world in, what do you expect?
Is this a set-up to prevent this lump of scum from being deported?
Wangita, who is unemployed, came to England as a young child with his mother, anyone know why he is being deported?
The South American victim, suffered multiple injuries and spent three nights in hospital following the attack, he will also not be deported now owing to him giving evidence at the trial.
Keeping Wangita and the others in custody will cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds, and the bill will rise even further, if they are convicted and jailed.
If you Invite the scum of the world in, what do you expect?
Answers
1 to 11 of 11
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
///this lump of scum///
Do you know him?
Or have you arrived at this judgement based on the information in the brief news reports?
he is a lump of scum because;
a. he is black?
b. he is a mass murderer's child? - seems harsh
c. he is unemployed? - a lot of people are unemployed at the moment, think they're scum too?
d. he is (allegedly) capable of taking part in an attack on someone? - fair enough if he's proven guilty
though it's rather inconsistent of you when a recent cowardly and thuggish attack by two soldiers that led to the army getting rid of them wasn't so much of an issue for you?
Either way, i expect the deportations will catch up with them all eventually.
Do you know him?
Or have you arrived at this judgement based on the information in the brief news reports?
he is a lump of scum because;
a. he is black?
b. he is a mass murderer's child? - seems harsh
c. he is unemployed? - a lot of people are unemployed at the moment, think they're scum too?
d. he is (allegedly) capable of taking part in an attack on someone? - fair enough if he's proven guilty
though it's rather inconsistent of you when a recent cowardly and thuggish attack by two soldiers that led to the army getting rid of them wasn't so much of an issue for you?
Either way, i expect the deportations will catch up with them all eventually.
he is a lump of scum because;
a. he is black?
b. he is a mass murderer's child? - seems harsh
c. he is unemployed? - a lot of people are unemployed at the moment, think they're scum too?
d. he is (allegedly) capable of taking part in an attack on someone? - fair enough if he's proven guilty
you said it boy !
a. he is black?
b. he is a mass murderer's child? - seems harsh
c. he is unemployed? - a lot of people are unemployed at the moment, think they're scum too?
d. he is (allegedly) capable of taking part in an attack on someone? - fair enough if he's proven guilty
you said it boy !
"Keeping Wangita and the others in custody will cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds, and the bill will rise even further, if they are convicted and jailed."
Do you propose deporting them immediately without trial?
Don't you think that if we implemented this kind of system, there's a danger that justice will not only not be done, but also not SEEN to be done.
If you had an illegal immigrant who committed a serious crime, are you saying that we should simply send them back from whence they came, without trial?
I ask this because of your statement:
"Keeping Wangita and the others in custody will cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds, and the bill will rise even further, if they are convicted and jailed."
It seems an odd conclusion to reach.
Do you propose deporting them immediately without trial?
Don't you think that if we implemented this kind of system, there's a danger that justice will not only not be done, but also not SEEN to be done.
If you had an illegal immigrant who committed a serious crime, are you saying that we should simply send them back from whence they came, without trial?
I ask this because of your statement:
"Keeping Wangita and the others in custody will cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds, and the bill will rise even further, if they are convicted and jailed."
It seems an odd conclusion to reach.
Everhelpful
/// AOG,I will join in your "debates" when you stop talking down to people. ///
What this has got to do with this question I just do not know.
On this site, I have been accused of many things by various people, but I have never been accused of talking down to them.
From this I can only assume that you personally, have one huge inferior complex.
/// AOG,I will join in your "debates" when you stop talking down to people. ///
What this has got to do with this question I just do not know.
On this site, I have been accused of many things by various people, but I have never been accused of talking down to them.
From this I can only assume that you personally, have one huge inferior complex.
AOG
I suggest you think that one through a bit more.
You're suggesting that we should do away with trial by jury and simply deport any immigrant arrested on a serious charge.
Or am I reading your wrong?
I hope I am, because what you propose is quite, quite mad.
Rapists, murderers, fraudsers - doesn't matter. If you're arrested, you get a 'get out of jail free card'.
How do you think the victims of crime would feel if they knew their perpetrators were sunning themselves in Barbados, or setting up another ponzi scheme in Germany?
Not the way we should go in my opinion.
I suggest you think that one through a bit more.
You're suggesting that we should do away with trial by jury and simply deport any immigrant arrested on a serious charge.
Or am I reading your wrong?
I hope I am, because what you propose is quite, quite mad.
Rapists, murderers, fraudsers - doesn't matter. If you're arrested, you get a 'get out of jail free card'.
How do you think the victims of crime would feel if they knew their perpetrators were sunning themselves in Barbados, or setting up another ponzi scheme in Germany?
Not the way we should go in my opinion.
/// sunning themselves in Barbados, or setting up another ponzi scheme in Germany?///
Interesting your choice of destinations, I can see a person being sent back to Barbados, (and before you shout "racist") because immigrants to this country are likely to come from that area, but how many immigrants come from Germany?
Interesting your choice of destinations, I can see a person being sent back to Barbados, (and before you shout "racist") because immigrants to this country are likely to come from that area, but how many immigrants come from Germany?
1 to 11 of 11
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles26 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles32 mins ago
Food & Drink36 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.