Editor's Blog0 min ago
A little too late?
1 Answers
http://www.dailyexpre....uk/posts/view/179924
It is a start, but is it too little, too late?
Now if they follow this up with the removing all signs and leaflets in a multitude of languages, then followed up with the abolishment of bodies of interpreters, then this will be getting somewhere.
If an interpreter is absolutely necessary, then this should be a chargeable service, to the immigrant/asylum seeker.
It is a start, but is it too little, too late?
Now if they follow this up with the removing all signs and leaflets in a multitude of languages, then followed up with the abolishment of bodies of interpreters, then this will be getting somewhere.
If an interpreter is absolutely necessary, then this should be a chargeable service, to the immigrant/asylum seeker.
Answers
Only 1 answer
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Skimmed through link but Oldgit if this measure of being able to speak basic english to control immigration was not implemented, you would be complaining about future immigrants who wish to settle here not being able to speak basic english.
It is not a question of being alittle too late but future considerations for social integration and as you highlight then economic ones as well.
It's unfair to penalize settled immigrants who require public services.
And besides, I did get this from the link - 'The measure is designed to close a loophole exploited by thousands of immigrant's who sneak into Britain.'
It is not a question of being alittle too late but future considerations for social integration and as you highlight then economic ones as well.
It's unfair to penalize settled immigrants who require public services.
And besides, I did get this from the link - 'The measure is designed to close a loophole exploited by thousands of immigrant's who sneak into Britain.'
Only 1 answer
