Donate SIGN UP

Hole

Avatar Image
Vagrant | 18:52 Wed 28th Jul 2010 | Civil
27 Answers
Is there any legal limit on the size of hole one can dig in one's garden?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 27 of 27rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Vagrant. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
Bushbaby - if it is covered by Planning Act (Fred seems to think not), what are the dimensions?
Its in section 55:

Meaning of “development” and “new development”

(1)Subject to the following provisions of this section, in this Act, except where the context otherwise requires, “development,” means the carrying out of building, engineering, mining or other operations in, on, over or under land, or the making of any material change in the use of any buildings or other land.

There are no prescribed measurements as every case is assessed on its own merits and in context. It also depends on whether its part of another operation which has planning permission or is permitted development. So a hole for a swimming pool which is of a size that benefits from PD would be fine. Digging the same size hole just to have a hole in your garden would need planning permission. Moving a bit of earth for a flower bed would probably be ok, but moving lots of earth to change the levels of your garden or create terracing would probably need permission.

As with everything in planning, there is no easy answer, which is why I asked what you were thinking of doing?
Grand canyon is a mighty big hole as well, 270 miles long, 9 miles wide and 1 mile deep. Try filling that using a tonka toy.
bushbaby, I like it! The parliamentary draftsman might as well have put 'development means anything done to land' except that that isn't quite draftsman's language.LOL The best argument on interpretation is to say that the words ' or other operations' have to be read in the context and taken as 'of a like kind', which at least explains why parliament didn't use an expression equating to 'anything'. Otherwise the closely defining words (e.g 'mining') are themselves unnecessary..'The Courts hate that and will ask why words such as 'mining' are there if parliament wanted to include anything and everything. Otherwise digging any hole in a garden would require planning permission and the only 'control' on that is the whim of the planning authority's officers and that can vary from day to day and , of course, place to place.
What 'unless the context otherwise requires' seem a messy inclusion i.e prima facie development sometimes does not mean development, unless they should be used to reinforce the argument against a wide interpretation of 'other operations'
Hi Fred, yes there is an awful lot of caselaw and appeal decisions used to try to clarify planning regulations for the reasons you highlight. My job definitely isn't an easy one!
Question Author
Thanks for your input everyone.
I'm not planning to dig anything deeper than fence post holes (600mm) so don't think I'll have a problem - I was just curious.
Well I just hope your fence is within the allowed height limits then lol

21 to 27 of 27rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Hole

Answer Question >>