I really believe BOTH parties should be named. It is not unusual for a rapist to be convicted because other victims have come forward after the publicity. In some cases these victims had reported the rape perhaps years before but it hadn't been tied to the present case (rapist a stranger, victim traumatised, etc).
Sometimes the rape occurred many years ago and it gives other victims the momentum to come forward with their own evidence after years of silence. Many paedophiles have been caught this way.
Likewise, some 'sick' women will cry rape many times over, or threaten to. This gives their victims the chance to have their say, too.
If it can be proven beyond any doubt the victim - male or female ( yes men have cried rape) then they should be imprisoned, or sectioned, depending on their mental health.