Society & Culture0 min ago
Yesterday........
A car pulled out in front of me. I managed to swerve and avoid it but.... If I had run into the back of it would it have been my fault. I always believed that if you ran in to the back of another vehicle it was always your fault.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by micmak. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.someone pulled out infront of me once - and I swerved to the right and scraped all down the side of their car!
Their fault - claim settled in my favour...
however - I dont see how it could be anyone elses fault but yours had you hit this car in the rear as they would have completed the manouvre and even if they had pulled out a bit pronto - you still should have had enough time to stop (and beep at them!).
Just thank your lucky stars someone was looking down on you ;-)
Their fault - claim settled in my favour...
however - I dont see how it could be anyone elses fault but yours had you hit this car in the rear as they would have completed the manouvre and even if they had pulled out a bit pronto - you still should have had enough time to stop (and beep at them!).
Just thank your lucky stars someone was looking down on you ;-)
it wouldnt be your fault,with the best will in the world you couldnt anticipate his actions no matter how fast or observant you were.
The only issue that i could see ,if there were no witnesses it would be your word against theirs , if the impact was square on it would easy for the 3rd party to say they just braked and you hit them from behind, no way of proving otherwise.
The only issue that i could see ,if there were no witnesses it would be your word against theirs , if the impact was square on it would easy for the 3rd party to say they just braked and you hit them from behind, no way of proving otherwise.
Generally yes, you should always be able to stop in time. My boss when I worked in insurance used to say "imagine that what you hit is a child running out in front of you". However if it was contested you could argue that the other driver was negligent in pulling out without making sure the road was clear enough for him to do so.
-- answer removed --