Private Eye Crossword 792 Help
Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by davidtheloon. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Sorry David - my answer was correct. The officer knows the speed from the gun's read-out. He knows the number of your bike because he read it and wrote it down. In court, he will just need to say on oath that the bike that was travelling at 48 m.p.h. was the same one that he took the number of. Paying the ticket now is the cheapest option.
hopalong - I doubt you can be charged with complying with the law - fornt number plates on motorbikes haven't been seen for years on UK roads.
Grunty - still not sure - but have no basis for that - just my intuition.
As i said, I really would get legal advice from someone who is on your side - ie a solicitor you engage.
Don't know if I'm in a time warp here. Number plates for Motorbikes were abolished in 1975 (well at least according to the Department for Transport)
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_transstats/documents/page/dft_transstats_507875.hcsp
I'm guessing chazza and hopalong are not in the UK. If they are, I suggest they stand at the side of the road and see how many number plates they can spot on the front of a bike. I think they will be there for a very long time!
If my memory services me correctly, plates were banned from the front due to health and safety reasons.
If the photograph shows evidence of you as the rider (comparing riding gear, lid, boots - any form of identifiable items) then you have no defence.
Also as previously mentioned, an oath would probably be good enough in the court as we all know that the Law hates us 2 wheelers having fun.
However, in your defence, if you were sneezing (classed as an act of god) then the reflex action could well be to open the throttle and thus exceed the limit - shaky, but worth a laugh!