Business & Finance6 mins ago
Should this savage be executed?
http://news.sky.com/s...Murder_In_Connecticut
There is no doubt of guilt, can there be a clearer case for capital punishement? Should he spend the customary 20 years in jail first?
There is no doubt of guilt, can there be a clearer case for capital punishement? Should he spend the customary 20 years in jail first?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
j-t-p, there was no doubt of guilt, the killer's lawyer did not bother to try to mount a "he didn't do it" defense and spent the trial arguing that the accomplice was mostly to blame, therefore his client should get life in prison not the death sentence. News reports here in the US were a little more thorough than the article linked above.
http://wikimapia.org/...Petit-Home-Crime-Site
The police caught them leaving the scene.
You do despair I vote yes my only reservation would be is its the easy way out.
The police caught them leaving the scene.
You do despair I vote yes my only reservation would be is its the easy way out.
I understand that a lot of people on death row are probably innocent because of the poor standard of their legal defence teams, I think it was Michael Moore who was talking about it.
This doesn't appear to be one of those cases, in countries within which the death penalty is available and in cases in which it applies then yes it should stand.
I watched Piers Morgan do a show on executions, what was bizarre was to see the face on an American legislator who when faced with a humane form of execution denounced it as unjust.
This doesn't appear to be one of those cases, in countries within which the death penalty is available and in cases in which it applies then yes it should stand.
I watched Piers Morgan do a show on executions, what was bizarre was to see the face on an American legislator who when faced with a humane form of execution denounced it as unjust.
It is amazing a person such as jake-the-peg goes out of his way to defend this savage, but this time he has amazed some of his ardent supporters.
But never fear he still gets a show of concern from sqad, while jno criticises the Geezer for daring to post a piece of news, because it hasn't happened in Britain.
But this is no surprise, he even criticises home grown British news, if it is alien to his thinking.
But never fear he still gets a show of concern from sqad, while jno criticises the Geezer for daring to post a piece of news, because it hasn't happened in Britain.
But this is no surprise, he even criticises home grown British news, if it is alien to his thinking.
If you cup your hand to your ear, you can hear the feverish tapping of computer keys spelling out....wait for it....(you know what's coming)..."The death sentance doesn't work because there are still murders in America yadda yadda yadda blah blah blah de blah"
If the report is accurate, and let's assume for the sake of the argument it is (and given the defence didn't, it appears, mount a defence it could be safe to assume the report is accurate) then in states where the death penalty is legal, then death would appear to be a just sentence.
That said, I do not agree with the death penalty. I do, however, believe that where the crime is so heinous, as in this case, that life should most certainly mean life and that the life sentence should be served in a cold dank cell and that the food provided should be just enough to keep them alive - preferably mouldy bread and/or insect laden gruel - and they should wallow in their own excrement.
Fortunately, unlike us (and the pathetic middle aged tweed clad WI on acid middle aged fat women in the Howard League) the Americans still know that prison is, first and foremost, a punishment.
If the report is accurate, and let's assume for the sake of the argument it is (and given the defence didn't, it appears, mount a defence it could be safe to assume the report is accurate) then in states where the death penalty is legal, then death would appear to be a just sentence.
That said, I do not agree with the death penalty. I do, however, believe that where the crime is so heinous, as in this case, that life should most certainly mean life and that the life sentence should be served in a cold dank cell and that the food provided should be just enough to keep them alive - preferably mouldy bread and/or insect laden gruel - and they should wallow in their own excrement.
Fortunately, unlike us (and the pathetic middle aged tweed clad WI on acid middle aged fat women in the Howard League) the Americans still know that prison is, first and foremost, a punishment.
I have always felt that a punishment should be a deterrent not a chance for rehabilitation.
In a case like this why shouldn't they be executed? Anyone who can defend the inhumanity of either of these need thier head testing. As I said the only reservation I have is that its the easy way out.
Maybe they can be burnt alive like thier victims but hey thats barbaric isn't it.
In a case like this why shouldn't they be executed? Anyone who can defend the inhumanity of either of these need thier head testing. As I said the only reservation I have is that its the easy way out.
Maybe they can be burnt alive like thier victims but hey thats barbaric isn't it.