Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
stricly's scoring
7 Answers
How do they score the dances.
I know they're out of ten but is ten dancing that dance perfectly but then as they do harder dances, wouldn't their scores then stay the same, even if they get better?
I know they're out of ten but is ten dancing that dance perfectly but then as they do harder dances, wouldn't their scores then stay the same, even if they get better?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mollykins. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I'm not a strictly fan but when I do watch it I see that the scoring is inconsistent.
On tonights show Paul Daniels essentially stood still for 90 secs apart from doing 1 awful turn and scored 5's and later I think Ann Widdecombe also scored 5's but her routine was clearly better and involved far more moves.
On tonights show Paul Daniels essentially stood still for 90 secs apart from doing 1 awful turn and scored 5's and later I think Ann Widdecombe also scored 5's but her routine was clearly better and involved far more moves.
I don't think there is anything scientific about the scoring. It's all down to the judges' opinions. A competently executed dance in the first week, using basic moves/steps, will get a favourable reaction from the judges, but by week 10 or 12, the dancers are expected to be using much more complex moves and executing them very well - one could almost say professionally.
As Redhelen says, a couple who dance a perfect waltz and then go on to perform a lousy rhumba probably only do so because they're just not naturally 'in tune' with the rhumba. Whereas a couple who really shine at the rhumba mightn't be able to do a good waltz if their lives depended on it. In theory, the winning couple are the ones who can do both equally well.
I find myself listening more and more to Craig Revel Horwood. He can be quite cruel but he usually speaks the truth, and dancers who take on board what he says often show a marked improvement over the course of the show.
As Redhelen says, a couple who dance a perfect waltz and then go on to perform a lousy rhumba probably only do so because they're just not naturally 'in tune' with the rhumba. Whereas a couple who really shine at the rhumba mightn't be able to do a good waltz if their lives depended on it. In theory, the winning couple are the ones who can do both equally well.
I find myself listening more and more to Craig Revel Horwood. He can be quite cruel but he usually speaks the truth, and dancers who take on board what he says often show a marked improvement over the course of the show.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.