News1 min ago
You've got to love the Daily Mail
37 Answers
Spot the difference between the two stories:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...nd-hampshire-11741262
http://www.dailymail....ts-claim-doctors.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...nd-hampshire-11741262
http://www.dailymail....ts-claim-doctors.html
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Oneeyedvic. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ./// Not that it anything to do with you , you nosy parker, but I have a little catching up to do with jake ///
I've said this before when you accused me of poking my nose in THIS IS NOT A PRIVATE FORUM - whatever is said on these pages is open to debate with everyone who is registered here, if you want a private conversation with someone, you need to e-mail them.
I have said this beore too, if I believe you are being out of order, I will say so. Live with it.
/// a little catching up /// ?
Ah I see, so your "rudeness only when attacked first" can also apply to something said in the dim and distant past, to be stored in whatever remains of your memory for a future attack, despite non "rude" exchanges in between ?
/// another opportunity to have a go at the Daily Mail ///
You seem to believe that this 'publication' should be immune from criticism.
I've said it before but here goes again:
the Daily Mail has a well earnt reputation for being loaded with twisted facts and provocative headlines deliberately aimed at people that WANT to be angry.
I've said this before when you accused me of poking my nose in THIS IS NOT A PRIVATE FORUM - whatever is said on these pages is open to debate with everyone who is registered here, if you want a private conversation with someone, you need to e-mail them.
I have said this beore too, if I believe you are being out of order, I will say so. Live with it.
/// a little catching up /// ?
Ah I see, so your "rudeness only when attacked first" can also apply to something said in the dim and distant past, to be stored in whatever remains of your memory for a future attack, despite non "rude" exchanges in between ?
/// another opportunity to have a go at the Daily Mail ///
You seem to believe that this 'publication' should be immune from criticism.
I've said it before but here goes again:
the Daily Mail has a well earnt reputation for being loaded with twisted facts and provocative headlines deliberately aimed at people that WANT to be angry.
Answerprancer
/// Just because I'm questioning a dogmatic bitter angry old fascist ? ///
I repeat,
Whereas as with you, you very rude person, I will never catch you up.
But I also add, you are not only rude but also a lying, offensive and aggressive cretin, (I was going to put person, but I thought I might as well speak in your language, the one you understand best)..
/// Just because I'm questioning a dogmatic bitter angry old fascist ? ///
I repeat,
Whereas as with you, you very rude person, I will never catch you up.
But I also add, you are not only rude but also a lying, offensive and aggressive cretin, (I was going to put person, but I thought I might as well speak in your language, the one you understand best)..
/// the Daily Mail has a well earnt reputation for being loaded with twisted facts and provocative headlines deliberately aimed at people that WANT to be angry.///
Now let's edit this a little, shall we?
The Daily Mail has a well earned reputation for being loaded with facts and headlines, deliberately aimed at the apathetic Left, on matters that they would rather the public did not know about. IT IS THIS THAT MAKES THEM VERY ANGRY.
Now let's edit this a little, shall we?
The Daily Mail has a well earned reputation for being loaded with facts and headlines, deliberately aimed at the apathetic Left, on matters that they would rather the public did not know about. IT IS THIS THAT MAKES THEM VERY ANGRY.
I agree with Mike, perhaps on a broader basis many of the problems we face today in our own society would/could be reduced by reintroducing that custom.
For girls the transition from childhood to personal rsponsibiity is quite easy to gauge biologically, with boys it's not.
Perhaps having that rite of passage, would make boys think about their behaviour and their role in the world.
Aside from the dubious(?) health benefits of short trousers for growing bones.
For girls the transition from childhood to personal rsponsibiity is quite easy to gauge biologically, with boys it's not.
Perhaps having that rite of passage, would make boys think about their behaviour and their role in the world.
Aside from the dubious(?) health benefits of short trousers for growing bones.
The non white population of Southampton is 7.6 percent.
(source http://www.southampto...ton_tcm46-167319.pdf)
Of that number a smaller proportion will be children and out of that a small proportion will have rickets.
The Daily Mail headline is misleading because the report focusses on Southampton (but the headline suggests these are national figures).
By even mentioning the fact that many affected children are from ethnic minorities is doubly silly because not only are their figures negligible in the case of Southampton, but they also serve to confuse their readership.
One poor soul wrote:
"It doesn't help when we have all these foreigner coming over here bringing all their Germs and diseases with them. We got rid of this and TB once"
That's one of the great things about the Daily Mail website - hours of fun reading the Ill-inform cobblers posted by their readers.
(source http://www.southampto...ton_tcm46-167319.pdf)
Of that number a smaller proportion will be children and out of that a small proportion will have rickets.
The Daily Mail headline is misleading because the report focusses on Southampton (but the headline suggests these are national figures).
By even mentioning the fact that many affected children are from ethnic minorities is doubly silly because not only are their figures negligible in the case of Southampton, but they also serve to confuse their readership.
One poor soul wrote:
"It doesn't help when we have all these foreigner coming over here bringing all their Germs and diseases with them. We got rid of this and TB once"
That's one of the great things about the Daily Mail website - hours of fun reading the Ill-inform cobblers posted by their readers.
I can vouch for that, I saw your post AP ;-)
However, what isn't being taken into account (as others haev mentioned) is that different races to have predisposition to certain medical conditions - it's a fact of medical life, it's not racist or immigrant stuff, all easily googles. Asians have a predisposition to diabetes (yes, it's a sweeping statement, but easily checked), black people have greater numbers of sickle cell anaemia sufferers. Rickets etc is to do with diet as much as anything else. Needs to be taken in context.
However, what isn't being taken into account (as others haev mentioned) is that different races to have predisposition to certain medical conditions - it's a fact of medical life, it's not racist or immigrant stuff, all easily googles. Asians have a predisposition to diabetes (yes, it's a sweeping statement, but easily checked), black people have greater numbers of sickle cell anaemia sufferers. Rickets etc is to do with diet as much as anything else. Needs to be taken in context.
Rickets has been known to be on the increase for the past 15years almost certainly due to lack of availability of sunlight in the UK.
TB is on the increase...particularly in Asians.
Syphilis and gonorrhoea on the increase in the UK.
We seem to be reverting back to the 40.s and 50.s
Daily Mail headlines were a bit "naughty"
TB is on the increase...particularly in Asians.
Syphilis and gonorrhoea on the increase in the UK.
We seem to be reverting back to the 40.s and 50.s
Daily Mail headlines were a bit "naughty"