Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Accused- Helen's Story BBC 1 Mon
9 Answers
Did anybody see this last night?
Great acting but could someone explain why the jury found her Not Guilty when she admitted the arson and why she did it?
Great acting but could someone explain why the jury found her Not Guilty when she admitted the arson and why she did it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by yogasun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I may have missed something, but...........
She must have been pleading Not Guilty with her original defence team (otherwise there would not have been a trial) which she then dispensed with.
Her addressing the jury ought to have been taken into account as mitigating circumstances when it came to sentencing........to find her Not Guilty (if the charge was indeed Arson) seems perverse.
As you say brilliant acting..........but I was left scratching my head a little.
She must have been pleading Not Guilty with her original defence team (otherwise there would not have been a trial) which she then dispensed with.
Her addressing the jury ought to have been taken into account as mitigating circumstances when it came to sentencing........to find her Not Guilty (if the charge was indeed Arson) seems perverse.
As you say brilliant acting..........but I was left scratching my head a little.
I know it is not the real world but if I had been on that jury I would have found in her favour for the sake of justice for her son. And I reckon, although not sure, as the verdict was not guilty does that mean that the owner of the warehouse would not be able to claim on his insurance....I know, I know, 'tis not real
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.