The Crown Court judge has no routine decision to make on whether the matter goes to trial. If it is brought to trial it must be heard unless there are exceptional circumstances which prevent it. Only if the judge believes there is insufficient evidence to support a conviction (in which case he would direct the jury to return a “Not Guilty” verdict) would he halt the proceedings and this would not be done until the trial begins and the prosecution evidence has been heard.
I assume this is the same matter as you referred to in your earlier questions (the last of which was this one):
http://www.theanswerb...l/Question963886.html
I must say I did not understand what you were saying then and I’m not that much clearer now. A committal hearing is a process in the Magistrates’ court where the defendant is formally committed (that is, sent) to the Crown Court for trial. It usually takes place about eight to ten weeks after the first appearance in the Magistrates’ court. Since, according to your earlier posts, your friend’s ex has been ordered to appear at the Crown Court on 18th January (you said 2010 but I assume you meant 2011) it is unlikely that the matter has reached the Crown Court by now. Until it does the Crown Court has no knowledge of the matter at all. Certainly no Crown Court judge would normally be involved in the proceedings before it appears at the Crown Court for the first time (which is usually a plea and directions hearing).
I am also unclear about the “judge raising the charge to GBH”. Certainly Magistrates (including a District Judge who may be sitting alone in the Magistrates’ Court) have no say in the choice of charge and it is unusual for a judge to become involved. It is the CPS who decides upon