Crosswords0 min ago
Is Assange on his way to the US?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12564865
I think this whole things stinks, the septics are upset because he leaks stuff they don't like and the turnips are brown nosing.
I think this whole things stinks, the septics are upset because he leaks stuff they don't like and the turnips are brown nosing.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by R1Geezer. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
QM
I notice that you avoided mentioning the New York TImes in your reply - do you think they should be prosecuted as well.
It should also be pointed out that the stuff that WikiLeaks published was redacted to remove info that could endanger lives. The US were offered the opportunity to advise on, or carry out the redactions, but refused.
You also repeated your claim that lives were put at risk, despite the fact that the White House denies it.
I notice that you avoided mentioning the New York TImes in your reply - do you think they should be prosecuted as well.
It should also be pointed out that the stuff that WikiLeaks published was redacted to remove info that could endanger lives. The US were offered the opportunity to advise on, or carry out the redactions, but refused.
You also repeated your claim that lives were put at risk, despite the fact that the White House denies it.
Rojash, I think that ANYONE who steals or uses material they KNOW to be stolen should be prosecuted, whether that material is my letters to my bank or the US military commanders' cables to the White House.
More to the point here - given that it IS regarding what the questioner asked - is my conviction...clearly shared by the judge whose verdict was pronounced yesterday...that Assange should be extradited to Sweden to face whatever charges have been laid against him there.
More to the point here - given that it IS regarding what the questioner asked - is my conviction...clearly shared by the judge whose verdict was pronounced yesterday...that Assange should be extradited to Sweden to face whatever charges have been laid against him there.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Birdie, the following is extracted from my earlier post, timed at 0842 Fri 25th...
"And there are leaks and leaks. Some are clearly for the good of society as a whole and others not. For example, if BA were found to be skimping on their aircraft servicing programme, we’d all as potential passengers deserve to know that."
That surely makes it perfectly plain that I am in total agreement with you as regards what you call "the interest of the wider general public." Are you, then, telling me that every single one of the multi-thousands of documents Assange has published fits into that category of information?
Concerning your final sentence above, I'd say that only about 0.0001% of (quote) "the recent Wikileaks information falls into this category." Certainly, if a military atrocity had occurred, we ought to know, HOWEVER the information was obtained, but it is crystal clear to me that Assange's desire is to create the maximum of anti-Americanism he can as well as the maximum of self-aggrandisement and supposed potential 'martyrdom'.
Again, though, regarding the Swedish business, is it your contention that he deserves to get away scot-free, even if he IS guilty of what he is suspected of, for no reason other than the supposed American rendition/kidnap nonsense?
Don't forget, the minute he flies out of Sweden a free man - whether before or after a trial or before or after serving a sentence - your £1.00 is forfeit! Cheers
"And there are leaks and leaks. Some are clearly for the good of society as a whole and others not. For example, if BA were found to be skimping on their aircraft servicing programme, we’d all as potential passengers deserve to know that."
That surely makes it perfectly plain that I am in total agreement with you as regards what you call "the interest of the wider general public." Are you, then, telling me that every single one of the multi-thousands of documents Assange has published fits into that category of information?
Concerning your final sentence above, I'd say that only about 0.0001% of (quote) "the recent Wikileaks information falls into this category." Certainly, if a military atrocity had occurred, we ought to know, HOWEVER the information was obtained, but it is crystal clear to me that Assange's desire is to create the maximum of anti-Americanism he can as well as the maximum of self-aggrandisement and supposed potential 'martyrdom'.
Again, though, regarding the Swedish business, is it your contention that he deserves to get away scot-free, even if he IS guilty of what he is suspected of, for no reason other than the supposed American rendition/kidnap nonsense?
Don't forget, the minute he flies out of Sweden a free man - whether before or after a trial or before or after serving a sentence - your £1.00 is forfeit! Cheers
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.