Donate SIGN UP

Should we get involved?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 13:06 Sat 05th Mar 2011 | News
14 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/5ufpvoz

Here we go again, we can't wait to get in there and have a go.

Why us? our politicians should be totally ashamed of themselves, they are making the biggest cuts in expenditure that this country has ever seen, yet they can still throw away millions on a no-win situation such as this.

If the situation in Libya escalates so much that we do indeed send these troops in, how long will we have these forces tied up?

I recently speculated on a Civil National Service, but if our deleted number of forces, (due to cut-backs) have to constantly police the world, then I can foresee the need for a Military National Service.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The spirit of Imperialism is a hardy beast.
Be fair - the Toffs have to look after their oil interests
Let the Middle East implode, and then watch the havoc on the British (global) economy and life at large.....


How naive can some folk be.............
Isn't military action designed solely to bring about 'Regime change' outlawed by the UN?
Question Author
ixion

/// Be fair - the Toffs have to look after their oil interests ///

Once again that over-worn comment regarding oil and the rich.

Can't you see rich or poor, we all have "oli interests"?

Every time you fill up your car, every time you notice the rise in prices of our every day items, and all these other things,

* Ink
* Crayons
* Dishwashing liquids
* Deodorant
* Eyeglasses
* CDs and DVDs
* Tires
* Ammonia
* Heart valves

Yes we all have a need to be concerned at the shortage of oil.
///Now ministers have approved a presence on the ground to gather information and boost the chances of the rebels.

The liaison teams will be primarily composed of envoys but will include some intelligence officers.///

///The teams are said to be there 'primarily' to gather information. But they will advise the rebels on how to secure a handover of power and set up a democratic government.///

Hardly matches the headline of that article ... gathering information and providing advice to the rebels is not quite the same as troops fighting alongside them. And as Libya is an oil producing nation, and as UK companies have interests there, it makes sense to provide assistance to the people who may wind up running the country.

The only mention of troops going in is made in the context of the Black Watch being on standby to help in the event of a ///humanitarian catastrophe/// - which means only when things look really bad.

And for what it's worth, a Navy ship was at Benghazi the other day to pick up people who wanted to leave Libya (UK, EU nationals and some from other countries) and to deliver medical supplies to the hospital there, so in sense we are already involved.
I must rush out and stock up on heart valves this very afternoon......

Do B&Q sell them?
Question Author
DTcrosswordfan

First one must have a heart, to find the need for them...
At last you have it AOG, we are a nation of Zombies.....!
Yes Cameron is proving a dead loss when it comes to foreign affairs. I thought that Blair was bad enough but Cameron is gung-ho. Even the US is playing this down but here we have British soldiers going into a war zone again. All he is doing in Libya is making the situation worse than before. It doesn't take much working out if you have 2 combatants with equal fighting abilities the situation will drag on much longer. Gaddafi has done nothing wrong, he has presided over 41 years and the West have done business with him. Who does he think could replace Gaddafi and have a decently run country...there is no opposition figure available and the country would run riot.

Why can't he just leave them to get on with it. If Gaddafi was finally defeated his supporters would forever blame Britain for taking sides against him. Someone should tell Cameron to shut up and solve the pressing problems at home!
Question Author
http://tinyurl.com/6349s5t

It would now seem that we are indeed involved up to our necks, we now have eight SAS men and a junior diplomat taken by this rag tag army of savages.

When will we ever learn these hooligans are not worth helping, when all they can do is to kick you in the teeth.
Are we helping them or helping ourselves? Apparently there are more than 100 Libyan police receiving training here in the UK. We need to show the potential leaders of the new regime that we can work with them too.
Question Author
sandyRoe

The question is can 'they' work with us?
Question Author
Hang on Sandy these are Gaddafi's police, and they and their families should be immediately sent back, before they can claim political asylum here.

http://tinyurl.com/5w5xfha

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Should we get involved?

Answer Question >>