As said last night I do not come onto this side of this site a lot so can someone put me in the picture, I have read the rules of the site & I would not go against them in any way, last night there was a post from JJ? someone comment on it as myself & a few others, myself I did not honestly think the post was in any way degrading, I think the point could have been put in a better light the way, the way the courts take action against whoever, I was about to put the Q's in myself but it would have been about the weights that are calculated by your suitcases etc, as we are aware the take off on a plane is calculated on the planes total weight. was JJ q'S Misconstrued?
TWR
Question Author
I dont think it was that bad JJ, but I think it's time we moved on as said eh?
Indeed, let not keep bringing up removed questions, If you have a concern why not ask the same question more formally in the right subject category without using words that can be open to interpretation, there is less chance of things getting ugly there.
You raise an interesting grammatical point, JJ. Had you typed, "Not one..." I would have unhesitatingly said is, singular. However "None", although a contracted form of "not one", is defined in Chambers as being either plural or singular, so "are" is acceptable, and in facts sounds more natural. It's a bit like the ill-educated grammatical pedants who insist on, "It is I", when the correct form is "It's me".
I thought it was "What Tiler" when my kitchen folk failed to turn up to put my Hotpoint in. Bloody revolutionists....but then I guess they do need to turn a wheel in life.
There are not separate rules for ChatterBank are there? I thought the rules encompassed the whole of AnswerBank. If this is so TWR should know as a long established member.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.