Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > This time his 'Human Rights' did not come to his rescue.

This time his 'Human Rights' did not come to his rescue.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:38 Mon 30th May 2011 | News
5 Answers
http://www.dailymail....HIS-human-rights.html

/// He was allowed to stay in Britain after winning a court case in 2010, using the 'right to family life' argument under Article Eight of the Human Rights Act, because he has a wife and two children here.///

If only he had known about Wayne Bishop’s case, we might have still be lumbered with this criminal also.
prev Can you please supply a caption
  
next Did she do anything wrong?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Avatar Image jackthehat
But we're not.............so hurrah for that !
14:52 Mon 30th May 2011
Avatar Image Gromit
It is good that his appeal was rejected and the deportation has taken place.
14:55 Mon 30th May 2011
Avatar Image Gromit
That was a bit muddled, I will try again.

It is good that the appeal was successful and that he has now been deported.
14:57 Mon 30th May 2011
Avatar Image rov1100
Common sense at last. I wish the judiciary stopped throwing these cases out and saved the taxpayer some money. We can all see two sides of the story but the judges only seem to interpret it one way for the defendent.
20:59 Tue 31st May 2011
Avatar Image HarryFindlay
Why was he released halfway through his sentence anyway?
21:05 Tue 31st May 2011

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

This time his 'Human Rights' did not come to his rescue.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.