ChatterBank4 mins ago
BMW to build the next generation of Minis in Britain.
17 Answers
http://www.dailymail....-Qashqai-Britain.html
German owned, Japanese owned, why can't cars such as this be made by British owned companies?
German owned, Japanese owned, why can't cars such as this be made by British owned companies?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Brits can certainly make cars. I think UK is producing more cars now than for many a year.
Sadly, British companies produced bad products that people didn't want after they had tried foreign vehicles.
The original Mini was a sales success but the idiots who ran Austin/British Leyland or whatever it was called managed to never make a profit on it. In fact I think they made a loss on every one they sold.
It's no good pointing the finger at the workforce and strikes etc.
Even without them the companies were a shambles and it is ultimately management's responsibility to make any enterprise successful.
It is easy to forget how the auto industry product - has improved over the past 40 years of foreign company dominance.
My first car in 1973 was a Ford Anglia. At 7 years old it was considered a cheap, tatty banger.
Today, our expectation is for a car to give good performance for many years - 7 years old is nothing, the roads are full of clean, reliable cars of that age and more.
I'm afraid if it had been left to the old dinosaurs of the British industry we'd still be being offered unreliable, hulking great rust buckets.
.
Sadly, British companies produced bad products that people didn't want after they had tried foreign vehicles.
The original Mini was a sales success but the idiots who ran Austin/British Leyland or whatever it was called managed to never make a profit on it. In fact I think they made a loss on every one they sold.
It's no good pointing the finger at the workforce and strikes etc.
Even without them the companies were a shambles and it is ultimately management's responsibility to make any enterprise successful.
It is easy to forget how the auto industry product - has improved over the past 40 years of foreign company dominance.
My first car in 1973 was a Ford Anglia. At 7 years old it was considered a cheap, tatty banger.
Today, our expectation is for a car to give good performance for many years - 7 years old is nothing, the roads are full of clean, reliable cars of that age and more.
I'm afraid if it had been left to the old dinosaurs of the British industry we'd still be being offered unreliable, hulking great rust buckets.
.
Because our car industry and a lot of industry generally was destroyed by the unions in the 60's and 70's. Even when they did produce cars they were poorly made hunks of junk. The foriegn makers just did it better. Management was deemed poor but in reality they could not actually manage because unions had such power that management where helpless. Red Robbo and co killed off their own industry.
R1
please explain how the union inspired workers turned good products into <<poorly made hunks of junk>>
Sadly, the products were inherently poor regardless of what was or wasn't done to them on the production lines.
Poor market research, poor R&D, poor design, outdated engineering.
The Japs couldn't believe how easy it was to develop product for this market. introduce it and spank the established Brands.
The auto workers in France and Italy are at least as stroppy and work shy as ours; and yet their manufacturers are going strong and still home owned.
.
please explain how the union inspired workers turned good products into <<poorly made hunks of junk>>
Sadly, the products were inherently poor regardless of what was or wasn't done to them on the production lines.
Poor market research, poor R&D, poor design, outdated engineering.
The Japs couldn't believe how easy it was to develop product for this market. introduce it and spank the established Brands.
The auto workers in France and Italy are at least as stroppy and work shy as ours; and yet their manufacturers are going strong and still home owned.
.
In the Mid 80's toyota wanted to build a factory near Dundee, unfortunately the unions would not agree to a single union deal, they wanted their usall half dozen marxist cooperatives to make sure productivity didn't occur. Result the Japs went elsewhere. Thankfully someone learnt from this and Nissan did build a factory in Sunderland a while after that. Unions are the greatest threat to industry, always have been.
You're right Geezer, my uncle was some kind of 'Production Manager' at Triumph and his stories were horrendous.
But along with the labour nonsense there were also tales of incompetence at the top and overall an uphill struggle to persuade everyone that the cars weren't cr@p because mostly they were.
But along with the labour nonsense there were also tales of incompetence at the top and overall an uphill struggle to persuade everyone that the cars weren't cr@p because mostly they were.
I don't know how true this is but I was told by a relative who worked for British Leyland that the company were known to occasionally force a strike from the workforce when sales were down in order to save money.they would announce for example that wash rooms & toilet blocks were going to be closed down for unnecessary maintenance & the workforce would have to use facilities some distance away, this would promote a strike because of losing the facility, & would allow the factory to be closed down saving enormous amounts in electricity & heating. Comments please.Ron.
Zeuhl, yes, they apparently lost £35 on each Mini they sold
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13285504
Doubtless it was all the fault of the unions.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13285504
Doubtless it was all the fault of the unions.
To get our Car manufacturing back on track, should the Government use some of our overseas investment to start up a factory, to produce an all British made car?
We have the designers and the skilled workforce, If good management is a problem, then they could always employ foreign personnel to manage, after all that is not unusual in soccer.
Time this country change from being a service provider and became a manufacturing country once again.
We have the designers and the skilled workforce, If good management is a problem, then they could always employ foreign personnel to manage, after all that is not unusual in soccer.
Time this country change from being a service provider and became a manufacturing country once again.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.