Donate SIGN UP

A question of grammar

Avatar Image
Coldicote | 10:27 Sun 10th Jul 2011 | Education
10 Answers
When is it correct to say "I were....." and "I was.....". Most of us have probably said "If I were you....." but I wouldn't expect to say "I were going for a walk this morning".
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Coldicote. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I were is used in the condition tense only- eg If I were you
"I were" is only used in the "subjunctive" form - a sort of imaginary mode, which most commonly appears after words like "if", or "I wish I were in Paris". . And even then it's more common today to say "if I was..." or "I wish I was".
I think there's some funny rule about use of the conditional tense matching the (otherwise) plural form of the verb with the singular person.

So ...

"I'd" (conditional tense) look it up "if" (conditional provision coming up) I were (plural form, usually used for first person plural, here being used for singular) you.
^ conditional tense
factor30, your attention is sought here

http://www.theanswerb.../Question1035572.html
As in

"I wish I were dead" not "I wish I was dead"
I'm not sure about that one, scotman.

Maybe ... "If I were you, I'd wish I was dead."
I think it's called the second conditional.
A text book gives the example "if I WERE you.." and refers to 'were' being used a sit's an impossible situation.

It then gives another example of the second conditional of "If I WAS the president I'd .." and describes this as an unlikley situation.

Maybe , then, I WERE is used only for impossible situations and I WAS is used for unlikely situations.

It just shows how complicated the English language is.
Not sure about that 'If I was the president...'
Usually, when we can say, but I'm not, after the If clause for example If I were rich (but I'm not) we use were instead of was. However, If I wasn't rich (but I am) needs the was. It's only this verb which this can happen to as none of the other verbs have two past verbs. ex. we use had for all persons
Question Author
Seems to me it's largely a matter of habitual use, but the comments about the conditional tense are an interesting explanation. I'll try to think before I use 'was' and 'were' in future! Thank you all for your interest and answers.

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Do you know the answer?

A question of grammar

Answer Question >>