Yes I like the wit of people commenting, however the one valid point, if the quake occurred around the channel tunnel area, it could be a devastating outcome.
>> This report then cites earlier quakes measuring: 4.3 in 1750; 4.5 in 1754; and 5.0 in 1878.
How could those earlier quakes be compared when the Richter scale didn't exist until Mr. Richter invented it in 1935? <<
the earlier quakes were on the great grandad richter scale which works them out in a different way
Bognor regis on the south coast, has suffered some problems in the last few years, a freak storm resulted in a twister which did a bit of damage recently, but lots of storm damage occured in 2000, caravans destroyed and roofs blown off homes, not nice, especially when its such a quiet little place.
A friend who lives in NZ has been reporting shakes and quakes on Facebook on an almost daily basis so i suppose we are relatively fortunate.
I was on the beach here in west sussex at lunchtime on my way to the office and there was no sign of the tsunami - just a sea too cold for a dip despite the sunshine, very disappointing - i really hate the climate here sometimes!
i know if i was on the Eurostar (which i use) and felt a quake while under the channel, there would be a brown patch on the seat when i left the train !!