ChatterBank1 min ago
Is this ban actually a good result for the EDL?
33 Answers
http://www.eastlondon...hapel_march_1_1004927
It would seem that the Mayor of Tower Hamlets has been successful in persuading the Met. who are about to convince the Home secretary to ban the proposed EDL march into Tower Hamlets.
But apparently this has not pleased the Far-Left, since it also bans them from causing trouble.
The following is taken from the comments on the Socialist Unity web site.
/// In an unprecedented step Scotland Yard has applied to the home secretary to ban all marches in five London boroughs for 30 days starting from 2 September.///
/// This means that the English Defence League march in Tower Hamlets, East London, set for 3 September will be banned. But the blanket ban will also cover the counter-demonstration organised by Unite against Fascism and United East End.///
/// The English Defence League is still planning to come to Tower Hamlets to hold a static demonstration. ///
/// Already anti-racist activists in Tower Hamlets have put out calls for the counter-demonstration to go ahead. ///
/// Socialist Worker backs all those who want to stand up to the racists. We call on everyone to come to Tower Hamlets on 3 September to show that the racist EDL is not welcome.///
/// Everyone who opposes racism and fascism should protest about the ban, which denies us our right to stand up to the EDL, and should mobilise to come to Tower Hamlets on 3 September.///
It would seem that the Mayor of Tower Hamlets has been successful in persuading the Met. who are about to convince the Home secretary to ban the proposed EDL march into Tower Hamlets.
But apparently this has not pleased the Far-Left, since it also bans them from causing trouble.
The following is taken from the comments on the Socialist Unity web site.
/// In an unprecedented step Scotland Yard has applied to the home secretary to ban all marches in five London boroughs for 30 days starting from 2 September.///
/// This means that the English Defence League march in Tower Hamlets, East London, set for 3 September will be banned. But the blanket ban will also cover the counter-demonstration organised by Unite against Fascism and United East End.///
/// The English Defence League is still planning to come to Tower Hamlets to hold a static demonstration. ///
/// Already anti-racist activists in Tower Hamlets have put out calls for the counter-demonstration to go ahead. ///
/// Socialist Worker backs all those who want to stand up to the racists. We call on everyone to come to Tower Hamlets on 3 September to show that the racist EDL is not welcome.///
/// Everyone who opposes racism and fascism should protest about the ban, which denies us our right to stand up to the EDL, and should mobilise to come to Tower Hamlets on 3 September.///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
AOG, just for your info, this is on the UAF's site:
...
Right to march against racist EDL
We, the undersigned, welcome the banning of the racist English Defence League’s march through Tower Hamlets.
However, we believe the headlines claiming the EDL have been ‘banned’ from Tower Hamlets are misleading. The EDL will still be holding a static protest in the borough.
We are also appalled to discover that the home secretary, Theresa May, has agreed to the Metropolitan Police’s application for a blanket ban on ALL marches across five London boroughs – Tower Hamlets, Newham, Hackney, Islington and Waltham Forest – and the City of London for 30 days.
This is a huge attack on everyone’s civil liberties and prevents people’s rights to oppose racism.
We have the democratic right to peacefully march through Tower Hamlets on 3 September to show unity of Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Sikh, Hindu, Black, Asian and LGBT communities, trade unions and all those against fascism and for freedom, and to voice opposition to the EDL’s attempts to divide us.
Our legal advice says there is no law that says if one march has been banned, all marches in that area must be banned.
It is our human right to peacefully march in Tower Hamlets.
We therefore support the joint Unite Against Fascism / United East End protest on Saturday 3 September.
...
Right to march against racist EDL
We, the undersigned, welcome the banning of the racist English Defence League’s march through Tower Hamlets.
However, we believe the headlines claiming the EDL have been ‘banned’ from Tower Hamlets are misleading. The EDL will still be holding a static protest in the borough.
We are also appalled to discover that the home secretary, Theresa May, has agreed to the Metropolitan Police’s application for a blanket ban on ALL marches across five London boroughs – Tower Hamlets, Newham, Hackney, Islington and Waltham Forest – and the City of London for 30 days.
This is a huge attack on everyone’s civil liberties and prevents people’s rights to oppose racism.
We have the democratic right to peacefully march through Tower Hamlets on 3 September to show unity of Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Sikh, Hindu, Black, Asian and LGBT communities, trade unions and all those against fascism and for freedom, and to voice opposition to the EDL’s attempts to divide us.
Our legal advice says there is no law that says if one march has been banned, all marches in that area must be banned.
It is our human right to peacefully march in Tower Hamlets.
We therefore support the joint Unite Against Fascism / United East End protest on Saturday 3 September.
Convicted violent criminal, Martin Smith, (National Officer of UAF and LMHR) was not happy when he found out that ALL demonstration are banned
martinuafmartin smith twitter
Theresa May has announced she is banning all demonstrations in 5 boroughs in London for 30 days - DISGRACEFULL ATTACK ON CIVIL LIBERTIES
13 hours ago
martinuafmartin smith twitter
Theresa May has announced she is banning all demonstrations in 5 boroughs in London for 30 days - DISGRACEFULL ATTACK ON CIVIL LIBERTIES
13 hours ago
>> We, the undersigned, welcome the banning of the racist English Defence League’s march <<
>> We are also appalled to discover <<
>> This is a huge attack on everyone’s civil liberties and prevents people’s rights to oppose racism. <<
this is what happens when the government bans things, if it is good for one it is good for the other
>> We are also appalled to discover <<
>> This is a huge attack on everyone’s civil liberties and prevents people’s rights to oppose racism. <<
this is what happens when the government bans things, if it is good for one it is good for the other
i said this on another post, ban all marches, then there is no quibbling by Mayor of TH, nor EDL, UAF, and all the nut jobs who just want to have a go at one another. London doesn't need any more demonstrations, we have had enough of bringing everything to a standstill, and disrupting the lives of ordinary citizens. Peaceful protests seem to be a thing of the past.
DF i don't agree with any of them, and sick and tired of finding London under siege, with some faction or another, often nothing to do with Britain, that can bring London to a grinding halt. It's not we need, as we are in such dire straights, businesses certainly don't need any more disruption. I am ashamed of people like the EDL, but equally of the foolish UAF, who seem to want to impose their will just as much on the rest, and they don't see that at all.
DF as London will be hosting the Olympics next year, whether many agree with it or not, no one wants to it be seen on tv news around the world as lawless, and out of control, and i'm sure that's how many see London now, which is a great pity, the rioting and looting hasn't just damaged small businesses and people homes, but our standing if you like, it is a great city, with loads to offer, if only the loons stay away.
Here is the EDL's report on the subject of double standards being employed between their ban and the Notting Hill Carnival's go-ahead.
It is a long read but one must admit they have a point.
/// On Saturday, London will host one of biggest carnivals outside of Rio de Janeiro. For three days, the streets of Notting Hill will be awash with people, all relishing the sights and sounds and hoping for at least a little of that famous British sunshine.
Unfortunately, the carnival is also a hotbed of criminal activity. Every year, drug gangs, thieves and warring gangs use the festivities as cover for their nefarious activities, and in past years there have been instances where the police have struggled to control hostile crowds.
In 1976, rioting broke out and 100 police officers were hospitalised. There were 66 arrests.
In 2006, there were 391 recorded crimes and 214 arrests made.
In 2007, 206 people were arrested, two people were shot, there were an undetermined number of stabbing victims, and a total of 336 crimes reported.
In 2008, there were running battles with the police and the police made 330 arrests. 21 dangerous dogs were also seized.
In 2010, the police bill topped a whopping £6 million, and two people were stabbed during the festival. That year, 235 people were arrested, four for gun crime. 53 arrests were made by British Transport police alone.
So far this year, there have already been two petrol bombs launched at passing police vehicles, and 35 people have been arrested for inciting people to riot on the day of the carnival.
Every year there are serious incidents, some of which are reported by the media, and many that go unrecorded. Every year there is unshackled anti-social behaviour which, in ordinary circumstances, would not be tolerated by the police. Perhaps it’s the scale of the event, or just the party atmosphere, but the police do turn a blind eye to much of this criminal activity.
This year, 10,000 officers will be deployed to police the event – the largest number ever. That is only a third less than the number of officers that were brought in to (gradually) restore order to the streets during the recent riots and looting. With such widespread criminality still only a very recent memory, the police are clearly concerned that there could be similar outbreaks of criminal damage and violence.
Already the police have been making pre-emptive arrests ahead of the event, and are expected to make many more. They make similar efforts every year, but this time the police are also thought to be making a concerted effort to clamp down on people using social media to incite trouble. Already there are reports of anarchists and radical activists organising public gatherings, and we understand that individual officers are becoming more and more anxious about the possibility of organised criminals hijacking the event.
Odd then, that it is the EDL march in Tower Hamlets on the following weekend that Theresa May, the Home Secretary, has decided to ban. How many EDL supporters have been arrested for any kind of incitement? None, of course.
We’re certainly not saying that it is the Notting Hill carnival that should be banned or face any kind of harsh restrictions on its attractions: the carnival brings joy to thousands of people, and attracts tourists from around the world. But placing a ban on the EDL march gives out completely the wrong message. It suggests that the government is far happier restricting our democratic right to peaceful protest than it would be to make sensible demands of the festival organisations that would help to minimise the number of officers required to police the event. ///
Cont.
It is a long read but one must admit they have a point.
/// On Saturday, London will host one of biggest carnivals outside of Rio de Janeiro. For three days, the streets of Notting Hill will be awash with people, all relishing the sights and sounds and hoping for at least a little of that famous British sunshine.
Unfortunately, the carnival is also a hotbed of criminal activity. Every year, drug gangs, thieves and warring gangs use the festivities as cover for their nefarious activities, and in past years there have been instances where the police have struggled to control hostile crowds.
In 1976, rioting broke out and 100 police officers were hospitalised. There were 66 arrests.
In 2006, there were 391 recorded crimes and 214 arrests made.
In 2007, 206 people were arrested, two people were shot, there were an undetermined number of stabbing victims, and a total of 336 crimes reported.
In 2008, there were running battles with the police and the police made 330 arrests. 21 dangerous dogs were also seized.
In 2010, the police bill topped a whopping £6 million, and two people were stabbed during the festival. That year, 235 people were arrested, four for gun crime. 53 arrests were made by British Transport police alone.
So far this year, there have already been two petrol bombs launched at passing police vehicles, and 35 people have been arrested for inciting people to riot on the day of the carnival.
Every year there are serious incidents, some of which are reported by the media, and many that go unrecorded. Every year there is unshackled anti-social behaviour which, in ordinary circumstances, would not be tolerated by the police. Perhaps it’s the scale of the event, or just the party atmosphere, but the police do turn a blind eye to much of this criminal activity.
This year, 10,000 officers will be deployed to police the event – the largest number ever. That is only a third less than the number of officers that were brought in to (gradually) restore order to the streets during the recent riots and looting. With such widespread criminality still only a very recent memory, the police are clearly concerned that there could be similar outbreaks of criminal damage and violence.
Already the police have been making pre-emptive arrests ahead of the event, and are expected to make many more. They make similar efforts every year, but this time the police are also thought to be making a concerted effort to clamp down on people using social media to incite trouble. Already there are reports of anarchists and radical activists organising public gatherings, and we understand that individual officers are becoming more and more anxious about the possibility of organised criminals hijacking the event.
Odd then, that it is the EDL march in Tower Hamlets on the following weekend that Theresa May, the Home Secretary, has decided to ban. How many EDL supporters have been arrested for any kind of incitement? None, of course.
We’re certainly not saying that it is the Notting Hill carnival that should be banned or face any kind of harsh restrictions on its attractions: the carnival brings joy to thousands of people, and attracts tourists from around the world. But placing a ban on the EDL march gives out completely the wrong message. It suggests that the government is far happier restricting our democratic right to peaceful protest than it would be to make sensible demands of the festival organisations that would help to minimise the number of officers required to police the event. ///
Cont.
When there is a very real risk of rioting, widespread criminal damage and other lawlessness, the government has make clear that it will spend a vast amount of public money on the necessary police presence, but place no restrictions on the event. There is far less of a risk of there being any disorder at the EDL demonstration on 3rd September, and yet we learn that restrictions will still be imposed. We will be allowed our demonstration, but there will be no march. Why the double-standard?
It is true to say that, although most EDL marches have been entirely peaceful, there have been problems in the past. But that was before we recruited a dedicated stewarding team, and before the police began to realise that the majority of trouble at demonstrations originates with the UAF. This is an organisation that follows us up and down the country inciting loosely organised Muslim gangs, such as the so-called Muslim Defence League, to violence. We’ve grown used to there being a very clear pattern: no UAF, no trouble.
Nowadays, the anti-extremism aims of our organisation are clear, and there is no reason to think that an EDL demonstration would contain any dangerous elements or that our presence would provoke more than the usual shrill, misinformed condemnation that we are used to from members of the far-Left.
But there’s another reason why banning our march sends out the wrong message. It suggests that it is the EDL, and not the extremism that we demonstrate about, which needs to be kept in check. The Home Secretary is inadvertently aiding radical Muslims, the far Left, and any other groups who wish for our criticism of radical Islam to be delegitimised. She is inadvertently telling the people of Britain that their concerns about the spread of radical Islam do not need to be treated with the respect they deserve, and that criticism of radical Islam can and should be censored. If nothing else, that sounds exactly like the arguments used by radical Muslims themselves.
Banning the EDL march will only serve to enhance radical Islam’s propaganda. If the government demonises and persecutes critics of radical Islam, then the radicals will be encouraged. They will see this as a strong sign that Britain is a country where their hateful ideology can grow, whilst at the same time actually being protected by the state.
We would have hoped that Theresa May would have realised this by now.
If this was the first time that she had banned one our marches, and if it were out of genuine concern for the safety of shop owners or local residents, then her decision could be understood, or even applauded. But, of course, it’s not. Our recent march in Telford, for example, was banned for no reason other than that the government was being petitioned by Muslim advocacy organisations. Why do they want to suppress criticism of radical Islam? Why do they want to target an organisation that, unlike some others, does make great efforts to distinguish between ideology and individuals, and between radical Muslims and ordinary, decent Muslims? Why do they want to misrepresent our aims and call us ‘Islamophobes’?
We believe that the decision to petition for a ban says more about our critics than it does the EDL.
Not surprisingly, the demonstration in Telford passed entirely peacefully. This is typical. When we have marched there is very rarely any violence, very few arrests (only a few for minor public order offences), and no criminal damage. Much of the time we are in fact the victims. If it’s not threats, incitement and purposeful misrepresentation by the UAF, it’s our leader receiving death threats from Muslim gangs (which, at our Luton demonstration, the police took seriously enough to issue Osman warnings).
Cont.
It is true to say that, although most EDL marches have been entirely peaceful, there have been problems in the past. But that was before we recruited a dedicated stewarding team, and before the police began to realise that the majority of trouble at demonstrations originates with the UAF. This is an organisation that follows us up and down the country inciting loosely organised Muslim gangs, such as the so-called Muslim Defence League, to violence. We’ve grown used to there being a very clear pattern: no UAF, no trouble.
Nowadays, the anti-extremism aims of our organisation are clear, and there is no reason to think that an EDL demonstration would contain any dangerous elements or that our presence would provoke more than the usual shrill, misinformed condemnation that we are used to from members of the far-Left.
But there’s another reason why banning our march sends out the wrong message. It suggests that it is the EDL, and not the extremism that we demonstrate about, which needs to be kept in check. The Home Secretary is inadvertently aiding radical Muslims, the far Left, and any other groups who wish for our criticism of radical Islam to be delegitimised. She is inadvertently telling the people of Britain that their concerns about the spread of radical Islam do not need to be treated with the respect they deserve, and that criticism of radical Islam can and should be censored. If nothing else, that sounds exactly like the arguments used by radical Muslims themselves.
Banning the EDL march will only serve to enhance radical Islam’s propaganda. If the government demonises and persecutes critics of radical Islam, then the radicals will be encouraged. They will see this as a strong sign that Britain is a country where their hateful ideology can grow, whilst at the same time actually being protected by the state.
We would have hoped that Theresa May would have realised this by now.
If this was the first time that she had banned one our marches, and if it were out of genuine concern for the safety of shop owners or local residents, then her decision could be understood, or even applauded. But, of course, it’s not. Our recent march in Telford, for example, was banned for no reason other than that the government was being petitioned by Muslim advocacy organisations. Why do they want to suppress criticism of radical Islam? Why do they want to target an organisation that, unlike some others, does make great efforts to distinguish between ideology and individuals, and between radical Muslims and ordinary, decent Muslims? Why do they want to misrepresent our aims and call us ‘Islamophobes’?
We believe that the decision to petition for a ban says more about our critics than it does the EDL.
Not surprisingly, the demonstration in Telford passed entirely peacefully. This is typical. When we have marched there is very rarely any violence, very few arrests (only a few for minor public order offences), and no criminal damage. Much of the time we are in fact the victims. If it’s not threats, incitement and purposeful misrepresentation by the UAF, it’s our leader receiving death threats from Muslim gangs (which, at our Luton demonstration, the police took seriously enough to issue Osman warnings).
Cont.
We do not attack mosques, we do not attack businesses, and we do not attack people. Not only because we have a moral objection to this kind of mindless criminality, but because we know that any such action would be counterproductive to our main aim: protesting the government’s woefully inadequate approach to tackling the threat posed by radical Islam.
It’s time our government abandoned the double-standards and began to recognise what effect discrediting legitimate criticism of radical Islam could have. It might prevent them from having to deal with difficult questions for a few years, but it will allow radical Islam to become even more deeply engrained in this country.
And that’s something that’s certainly worth protesting about.
It’s time our government abandoned the double-standards and began to recognise what effect discrediting legitimate criticism of radical Islam could have. It might prevent them from having to deal with difficult questions for a few years, but it will allow radical Islam to become even more deeply engrained in this country.
And that’s something that’s certainly worth protesting about.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.