Why is it?

[Rapunzel61]

Less seems to cost more. I'm looking through a lingerie catalogue here, (Not mine, my daughters, I hasten to add, it's Mark's and Spark's sensible or sloggi knickers for me now!)

A bit of lace, and I do mean a scrap sewn onto a bit of covered elastic that must feel like a bloomin' cheese-wire to wear, £38, matching 1/2 cup bra £56. How can they justify that?

[boxtops]

'cos people will pay it....

[Quassia]

You can't justify it Rapunzel.

[bednobs]

i wish i could wear fancy-malancy underwear :) Perhaps it's because of the design or something? and agree with Boxy

[ladybirder]

I wouldn't pay £56 for a M&S bra.

[boxtops]

I wear M&S all the time, I know it fits. At the risk of being revealing - I have 20 pairs of pants all the same, never have to worry about which ones to put on.

[Rapunzel61]

my youngest won't go out without matching undies! I found this out after I'd bought her a pair of rather pretty coffee coloured silk and lace french cami-knickers. Why don't you wear them i asked. because I don't have a bra to match" she replied