Editor's Blog1 min ago
Why don't the landed pro Traveller brigade....
17 Answers
Adopt one each and give them give them a plot on their land?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by BrainsTracy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.That's great Nox. I'm glad it has worked out for you. May I ask, do you think that travellers should be exempt from abiding by planning laws etc. when they move onto land they have purchased and land they have simply taken over? Or should they have to adhere to the same laws as everyone else? Just interested on how you see this.
P.S. Hope all is going well for you. Always nice to see you on here.
P.S. Hope all is going well for you. Always nice to see you on here.
The blond bloke featured in last nights dispatches explained how he bought the land, then moved in lock stock and barrel when the council offices were closed on the bank holiday, so there was no one around to take action. Then simply built on the land, even though they had no planning permission. So break the law, don't pay tax, insurance, nothing, what a cheek
CONT. on green belt land.
There is 5 acres of greenbelt land near me which is covered with delapidated , rusting corrugated iron buildings, but the owner gets away with it because they are temporary buildings. In fact they have been there over 30 years. I expect the council will not be able to remove any movable buildings on Dale Farm if the travellers claim they are for agricultural use.
There is 5 acres of greenbelt land near me which is covered with delapidated , rusting corrugated iron buildings, but the owner gets away with it because they are temporary buildings. In fact they have been there over 30 years. I expect the council will not be able to remove any movable buildings on Dale Farm if the travellers claim they are for agricultural use.
No not counting my belonging thanks AOG, theyre all quite safe and sound. I think Carakeel that if they have bought the land and provided themselves with somwhere to rest ( there being pitifully few places suited to their needs which are provided by local councils) then it should at least be examined whether or not the best thing would be to allow them to stay. People have a right, ALL people, not just non travellers who tend to be the majority who make the laws, to live in a manner in keeping with their heritage and ethnicity, and in the case of travellers this is not to bung em into the nearest council slum, which is usually the option. I fully appreciate that people have issues with them seemingly flauting the law on planning, but there has to be sufficient provision for people who wish to live a transient life, just as there has to be sufficient provision for those of you who don't. Not many of you would relish the idea of being forcibly moved on every few weeks and made to live in a caravan, just so, these people have no desire to settle and live in houses.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.