Well I Never, Nigel Farage Is In Favour...
Society & Culture3 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by sg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I can't see anyone being tempted to use heroin because of this film - and isn't the bit where he steals the money the bit where he sort of pledges to 'choose life' meaning he is going to get clean? And think what he had to endure before he got the money....
Many films glamourise drugs but I don't think this is one - thats like saying teaching sex education in school glamourises underage sex
As no one would be tempted to take a chain saw to someone after watching it on film..
For Boo...... http://barnze.blogspot.com/
Of course it's Irvine Welsh's story put to film. Both could be seen as an a reaction to the just say no blanket condemnation of drugs in the media. It was justified in my opinion. It just felt like there were more deaths and consequences in the book.
I also think some scenes in Pulp Fiction were more explicit and less justifiable.
Mmm, let's see. The central character has several friends. One goes to prison for shoplifting, one(previously 'clean') tries drugs, becomes an addict, contracts HIV and dies of a brain abscess. A baby dies of starvation/neglect whilst its parents are in the middle of a heroin induced coma and most(apart from Renton leaving Spud some money) of the group of 'friends' are prepared to screw each other in a drugs deal.
Yep, it's all glamour in the world of heroin!