News0 min ago
oap
19 Answers
read in a daily paper to day
old age pension is going to be cut by £15
feom next april
anyone one heard of it
old age pension is going to be cut by £15
feom next april
anyone one heard of it
Answers
My private pension has changed from RPI to CPI (they have to follow the governments policy). My union said I'd be no worse off......... ....
16:20 Wed 26th Oct 2011
http://www.mirror.co....unds-115875-23515102/
is this the story?
is this the story?
http://www.mirror.co....unds-115875-23515102/
Oh I did hear some discussions about swapping from RPI to CPI, but not taken much notice of it.
Oh I did hear some discussions about swapping from RPI to CPI, but not taken much notice of it.
One wonders, if you are to be no worse off, why they are so keen to make a change.
Seems to me folk should be made to stick to whatever is first agreed, but in practice it seems if those with power want to change something the small folk have to put up with it.
Well hope it all wiorks out in the end.
Seems to me folk should be made to stick to whatever is first agreed, but in practice it seems if those with power want to change something the small folk have to put up with it.
Well hope it all wiorks out in the end.
RPI is the Retail Price Index, taken from the cost of a basket of groceries and compared with the previous year as a per centage.
CPI is the Consumer Prices Index, the cost of goods and services. Very similar to RPI then but the calculations are very different.
The CPI takes the calculation as an average of the lowest prices over the previous 12 months, whereas the RPI is calculated as an average of the average prices over the previous 12 months.
CPI is the Consumer Prices Index, the cost of goods and services. Very similar to RPI then but the calculations are very different.
The CPI takes the calculation as an average of the lowest prices over the previous 12 months, whereas the RPI is calculated as an average of the average prices over the previous 12 months.
Twix is quite right. The court case referred to brought by the public sector unions is disputing the government’s decision to increase state sector occupational pensions by the lower CPI instead of RPI. The percentage losses alleged are cumulative over a number of years.
The Coalition promised to upgrade the State pension by either the increase in average earnings, or RPI or CPI, whichever is the greatest of the three. Their handling of the economy has seen the annual increase in RPI rise to 5.6% last month (upon which next April’s State pension increase will be based) and CPI to 5.2%. Faced with this, there is now talk that such an increase might be seen as “unfair” on workers (many of whom have seen no increase in their pay). So they are considering using an average of the last twelve months RPI figures because they consider the September figure to “unrepresentative”.
Of course this would be perfectly OK if a similar arrangement had been made on the numerous occasions in the past when a particularly low September figure was produced and it was considered “unrepresentative” of the otherwise high inflation figures of the rest of the year.
But strangely, it wasn’t.
The Coalition promised to upgrade the State pension by either the increase in average earnings, or RPI or CPI, whichever is the greatest of the three. Their handling of the economy has seen the annual increase in RPI rise to 5.6% last month (upon which next April’s State pension increase will be based) and CPI to 5.2%. Faced with this, there is now talk that such an increase might be seen as “unfair” on workers (many of whom have seen no increase in their pay). So they are considering using an average of the last twelve months RPI figures because they consider the September figure to “unrepresentative”.
Of course this would be perfectly OK if a similar arrangement had been made on the numerous occasions in the past when a particularly low September figure was produced and it was considered “unrepresentative” of the otherwise high inflation figures of the rest of the year.
But strangely, it wasn’t.