As a foul shot, as a nominated red because when re-spotted it was snookering the last remaining red and as a colour after potting it as a nominated red?
i make that 3
1 as a foul shot
2 as a nominated red because when re-spotted it was snookering the last remaining red
3 as a colour after potting it as a nominated red
Once as a foul shot.
Once as a nominated red.
Once as a colour after the red.
Three times in a row or do you mean by the same player? In which case I don't know.
A foul shot commited by your opponent whilst potting the pink, resulting in the pink being re-spotted in such a way as to obscure any remaining Reds, that's 1.
You then nominate Pink as a Red in a free ball situation and pot it,
that's 2.
The Pink is re-spotted and you've left yourself in perfect position to pot the Pink again and collect aother 6 points,
that's 3.
Can't the player that committed the foul be asked to play again? So therefor they would pot it three times in a row with the above scenario, not very likely but possible.
All of these snooker loopy things are theoretical or at least very unusual. It's like the equivalent Football scenarios mostly they would never happen but are theoretically possible under the laws of the game.