News0 min ago
Discrimination or a victory for common sense?
32 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Common sense! If you move to a country whose language you can't speak, you SHOULD be required to learn that language. If you don't, you're segregating yourself. I've moved to the UK from the USA, luckily we speak the same language, but I've had to learn all the different terms and slang that are different here than in the US, which I was excited and glad to do. I'll always have my own accent, but I definitely speak in such a way that people here know what I'm on about!
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
I respect other peoples views, but my own view is that if a person chooses to live in a 'foreign' land as a resident. then that person should, out of courtesy to his/her hosts,make an effort to speak that nations language, not to do so displays an ignorance, and a view that the host people should speak their language.
Sounds like the Mail putting a bit of a "slant" on the case.
As pa_ul first pointed out, it was the applicant's inability to get a job which led to the refusal of permission.
His inability to speak English did mean that he wouldn't easily find a job.
Mind you ...he could have looked for work as a mime act.
As pa_ul first pointed out, it was the applicant's inability to get a job which led to the refusal of permission.
His inability to speak English did mean that he wouldn't easily find a job.
Mind you ...he could have looked for work as a mime act.
/// Sounds like the Mail putting a bit of a "slant" on the case. ///
http://www.guardian.c...k-english?INTCMP=SRCH
http://www.guardian.c...k-english?INTCMP=SRCH