See, this is where you and I differ in opinion, Sub sinker. I already knew that filmed sequences were spliced together for dramatic effect. I already knew that sound effects were often added in to add drama and realism to the footage, and for narrative effect. I also already knew that the BBC were extremely unlikely to send a camera crew, at great risk to themselves and of course to the pups, to film a polar bear giving birth or immediately post delivery, because, frankly, that would be dangerous and irresponsible.
Who, in their right mind, would think otherwise? 12 million or so viewers, a grand total of 50 complaints, and around 1/2 a mile of frothing outrage from media commentators about alleged BBC bias or untruths.
Of those 4 examples you offered from the Telegraph, which of those materially misled the viewer over the science of the event itself? Do Tragopans live in china and surrounding bits of China? why yes they do. Do clown fish hatch from eggs? you know, I think they do.
If the Beeb had shown footage which misrepresented the facts or science of the event, then maybe it might be worth remonstrating, which no doubt a whole bunch of naturalists would be only too happy to do. Otherwise, its all a mountain out of a molehill......