In the bible there is only "one" God right?

[tweaker]

So, in Genesis 1.26, 3.22, and 11.7.

Whom is "US" then ?

[tweaker]

Naomi,

Which would be?

I might add I have a scholarship in Greco/Roman antiquity, and get my kicks from the BS that people arrive at with no concrete sources here.

That is why I haven't been "around". I work in the field of such studies.

You have my email, do tell me where you get your "sources" from, please!

[naomi24]

Oh dear, Tweaker. For such an educated man, that doesn't sound terribly mature. I think I'll decline your invitation, thanks. I would hate to think of myself as a source of entertainment for you.

[tweaker]

Everybody gets their daily jollies Naomi.

I've just arrived at a different conclusion. That the bible/ non canonical books need's to be left in it's own time, and taking it out of it's context is well, stupid.

Could we agree on that?

[naomi24]

Yes, you've arrived at the conclusion that everyone else is talking 'BS'.

And no, we can't agree on that. I don't believe those texts should be left in their own time because much of what they contain is far from stupid.

[jake-the-peg]

So Tweaker - how's your Hebrew?

I mean how solid a source is the old testament unless you are able to read it for yourself in the original?

[tweaker]

Well Jake, since the earliest scrips of the OT are 1000c.e Until partial fragments of the DSS came along not good! Only Greek I study in. Although I may Amazon.co.uk User Recommendation

Along with the Anchor bible dictionary is a good start.

Why ask the Hebrew? A lot is in Aramaic, and Greek, and from the Hellenistic era a good deal of scripts.

[jackthehat]

Are you channelling Yoda, tweaker?

[tweaker]

Yoda: Tweaker is no contendant to Yoda!

Mind you, watched men stare at goats did I. Ummmm!

Back to Tweaker: A very odd film I thought!

Yoda: One has seen 'Take shelter' ? a film. Very appropriate thought I.

Tweaker: Has any one else viewed it?