Sunday Times General Knowledge (Gk) Name...
Offers & Competitions0 min ago
I've just read on the BBC website that Babar Ahmad, a British citizen, may be extradited to the US under the terms of the ExtraditionTreaty of 2003, but I can't understand why. If he is being accused of inciting terrorism on his website, why isn't he being charged and prosecuted here? If he'd actually been to the USA and behaved in this manner, I could understand the extradition, but I can't find any evidence he was there. Are there any legal brains available on AB who can explain this to me? It seems mighty unfair!
No best answer has yet been selected by Drusilla. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Possibly more pertinant - but you have to dig through a lot of hype to get this information is that he is accused of being in possession of secret American documents describing US Naval vulnerabilities.
Worrying though because there is a principal that Britain will not extradite if the subject could face the death penalty.
This would seem to violate that principal
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.