How popular is your name?

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.telegraph....lar-is-your-name.html

[commoner]

There ain't nobody called commoner...Aw!

[sunny-dave]

Well david is in severe decline, 2500 → 1100, but dave[i is holding on bravely at around a dozen each year.

I wonder if blokes named as [i]dave[i] will then choose to call themselves [i]david] in a sort of reverse protest ...


< dratted italisc - i gvie oop >

[FredPuli43]

Not very. Down to 104th from 25th. Surprised to find that some people have called their child simply ' C' !

[sunny-dave]

Jesus wept ...

< not a lot of him around either >

[emmie]

chapta, no more than yours i expect..

[annie0000]

Hmmm - it actually thinks my sons name is a girls name......he will not be pleased. I wonder how many of the 9 who've been given it are girls??

[EcclesCake]

Wow, no child has been registered with my name since 2007.

I'm intrigued by the peaks and troughs in alternate years, given my name has never been fashionable or popular.

[EvianBaby]

400 in 1999. Which seems high compared to others. I'm not sure I'm happy about that.

[Traci66]

Not at all. My dad has a lot to answer for.

[Prudie]

Haven't read all the threads but there were only 6 in 2010 and highest was 11 in 1998. Knew it was unusual but not THAT unpopular!

[Stephen_G]

Less than 300 Stephens in 2010 - better than Steven though. Not very popular either..... :-(

[gness]

But if your profile is correct paddywak you wouldn`t want to share my name.xx

[paddywak]

I see what you mean gness, I didn't realise you were a young lady till I checked your profile

[HowardKennitby]

apart from a blip 20o4/5 mine is becoming progressively less popular.

[gness]

Thank you for the young! Not the first time I`ve been thought a man on here. As I said before I must invest in a better razor.

[tiggerblue10]

No one with my name. Don't think there will be any pre 96 either.

[anotheoldgit]

ChuckFickens

Can you not possibly take a joke? See my smiley?

You may consider yourself a bit of a technic on this site, but such skills are not everything, perhaps you should consider taking a course in politeness, as there is no need whatsoever for such replies as the one you gave me.

Obviously it must have been my attempt at correcting your reference to the Daily Mail mistake that sent you off on one, perhaps as well as being rather very rude you are the type of person that doesn't take to be proven wrong?

A better person would have apologised for the simple mistake and carried on enjoying the site, without the need for producing ill feeling between two ABers.

[4getmenot]

my name shot up in 95 to 120 and in 2010 back to 45