ChatterBank0 min ago
Chris Hulne – ‘Perverting the course of justice’
I see that his former wife is to use the defence of ‘marital coercion’ as her defence in this case. Basically claiming that she did indeed pervert the course of justice (by taking her then husband’s speeding points), but was ‘pressured’ into doing it.
So later this year the High Court will have to decide whether to believe a spurned wife or a former government minister.
My money’s on the spurned wife.
Worth a bet would be that the court finds both guilty; not accepting her defence of coercion.
So later this year the High Court will have to decide whether to believe a spurned wife or a former government minister.
My money’s on the spurned wife.
Worth a bet would be that the court finds both guilty; not accepting her defence of coercion.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I believe that only in exceptional circumstances would someone found guilty of perverting the course of justice, escape a jail term.
According to Wikipedia, Jonathan Aitken is the only British cabinet minister ever to have been sent to jail – hopefully Mr. Huhne will soon be an addition to that list.
According to Wikipedia, Jonathan Aitken is the only British cabinet minister ever to have been sent to jail – hopefully Mr. Huhne will soon be an addition to that list.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.