News1 min ago
BT checking faults on a line - or not
17 Answers
I tried calling a number for over an hour, but it was constantly engaged, so I called BT to ask them to check if there was a fault on the line. They asked me to confirm the first line of the subscriber's address, which I couldn't do. Their answer? 'Sorry, can't check the line unless you can give us the addess'.
I've always been able to have a line checked with no problem. When did the rules change - and why? Surely them checking for a fault - and telling me if there is one or not - does not contravene something like data protection? If I don't know the people, or where they live, how can it?
I've always been able to have a line checked with no problem. When did the rules change - and why? Surely them checking for a fault - and telling me if there is one or not - does not contravene something like data protection? If I don't know the people, or where they live, how can it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This just worked on two numbers I tried to get the addresses.
http:// msxml.u k.info. ...L5N1 9523367 7&infoa d=1
http://
A mountain out of a mole hill (again). The subscriber is you (or more accurately the person who pays the phone bill); you were asked to provide extra information to prove that you were who you claimed to be so that they could proceed with your enquiry. Otherwise you might have been a rogue caller intent on stealing information.
My mother was in the habit of not replacing the phone properly after answering a call. This meant her number was often 'engaged'. I'd ask the operator to put on what was known as a 'howler', which made a very loud noise on the phone that could be heard from almost anywhere in the house. That would draw my mum's attention to the phone and make her hang up properly.