Why Should We Store Tins Of Beans Upside...
Food & Drink1 min ago
GRRRR ... if its to be believed!
11 Answers
Answers
1 to 11 of 11
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ann. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Scaremongering by the mail again.
As normal they have converted a lot of mights, ifs and possibles into definites. they've failed to acknowledge that even if a household is affected the majority of them will simply need to fit a filter, that will be supplied for free, to the back of the TV or freeview box so no costs involved at all.
The fact they referred to freeview as a cable service in the article gives some idea of the level of technical knowledge the author of the article has, which is probably somewhere in line with an aardvark!
The mail is really not the place to read anything technical, their business is selling papers, not informing people of the truth about anything.
As normal they have converted a lot of mights, ifs and possibles into definites. they've failed to acknowledge that even if a household is affected the majority of them will simply need to fit a filter, that will be supplied for free, to the back of the TV or freeview box so no costs involved at all.
The fact they referred to freeview as a cable service in the article gives some idea of the level of technical knowledge the author of the article has, which is probably somewhere in line with an aardvark!
The mail is really not the place to read anything technical, their business is selling papers, not informing people of the truth about anything.
Well it will cost tax payers because of the £180m the government have put aside to deal with any possible problems, but in the grand scheme of things that really isn't anything!
It's misleading because the mail have taken the actual details of up to 2million people might be affected of which a small percentage would need to have mast head filters fitted at a cost to themselves and changed it to millions of people will be affected and will have to install mast head filters at a cost to themselves.
A small percentage of 2million is vastly different to millions of people.
It's misleading because the mail have taken the actual details of up to 2million people might be affected of which a small percentage would need to have mast head filters fitted at a cost to themselves and changed it to millions of people will be affected and will have to install mast head filters at a cost to themselves.
A small percentage of 2million is vastly different to millions of people.
Typical DM - Oh the hard pressed taxpayer will pay or millions of people will have to shell out
If I might take you back to the auction of the 3G bandwidth - that netted the Treasury £22 Billion
With the 4G auction coming up I think they can put a bit of that aside to fix any technical problems without the DM and the Taxpayers alliance and all the other usual suspects screaming the house down
With the 4G auction this year the Government
If I might take you back to the auction of the 3G bandwidth - that netted the Treasury £22 Billion
With the 4G auction coming up I think they can put a bit of that aside to fix any technical problems without the DM and the Taxpayers alliance and all the other usual suspects screaming the house down
With the 4G auction this year the Government
1 to 11 of 11
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.