I cannot but agree with Fred here. The Homicide Act of 1957 led to so many anomalies that its lifespan on the statute book was a short eight years. He mentions correctly the case of poisoners. Prior to the Act, when the penalty of death was mandatory in all cases of murder, it was an unwritten rule that those convicted of murder by poison were never reprieved from the gallows, as it was considered the ultimate crime with regard to intent. Yet under the new Act it became a non-capital offence. Many will be familiar with the case of Ruth Ellis, a glamorous twenty-something blonde hanged in 1955 for pumping six bullets at point-blank range into the heart of her faithless lover. Yet how many will recall the case of Louisa Merrifield, a not-so- glamorous forty something hanged two years earlier (rightly in my opinion) for the murder of an old lady whom she had befriended then proceeded to kill by putting rat poison into the lady's jam jar in order to inherit her bungalow, worth £3000, which had been promised to her by the said victim.
After the execution of Ruth Ellis the hangman, Albert Pierrepoint, was pursued by journalists on leaving the prison asking, " Mr Pierrepoint, what does it feel like to hang a woman?". His reply was, "Pity you weren't around here last year to ask me that question when I hanged Mrs Chrystophou, or the year before up in Manchester when I hanged Mrs Merrifield."