News9 mins ago
Is abortion ever justified?
18 Answers
Is there any distinction (other than age) between a 12 years old pregnant rape victim and a 30 years old who has multiple abortions as her form of contraception?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by McMouse. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.FGT - I also know someone who had multiple abortions. Her last one was refused on the NHS and she had to do it privately.
To the OP - yes, it can be justified. It's not just 'slappers' that have abortions. Contraception is not 100% (although it is getting better) along with human error; unwanted pregnancy will happen.
Hands up ladies - how many of us have forgotten to take the pill? How many get poorly and puke it up?
I am the mother of a child conceived through my forgetfulness. I was lucky to be in the position to be able to afford to have him.
To the OP - yes, it can be justified. It's not just 'slappers' that have abortions. Contraception is not 100% (although it is getting better) along with human error; unwanted pregnancy will happen.
Hands up ladies - how many of us have forgotten to take the pill? How many get poorly and puke it up?
I am the mother of a child conceived through my forgetfulness. I was lucky to be in the position to be able to afford to have him.
There are those who say using the pill is using abortion as a form of contraception....I suppose in a way, medically speaking they are right but most people wouldn't look at it that way...
One of the ways the pill works is to make the womb inhospitable to a FERTLIZED egg. If the fertilized egg cannot implant and dies or passes during menses, then an abortion has happened. .....
One of the ways the pill works is to make the womb inhospitable to a FERTLIZED egg. If the fertilized egg cannot implant and dies or passes during menses, then an abortion has happened. .....
Completly agree with China Doll.
However, possibly slightly off the op, I think there's some pretty cynical internal party politics going on around turning the issue into a popularity contest dutch auction at the moment.
On the one hand, we have Cameron saying there's absolutely no intention to review current time limits, and on the other he, Theresa May and Maria Miller (Minister for Women) saying they'd "personally" like to see a reduction in time limits from 24 to 20 weeks and James Hunt saying "personally" he'd like to see 12 weeks. So what's going on there then?
However, possibly slightly off the op, I think there's some pretty cynical internal party politics going on around turning the issue into a popularity contest dutch auction at the moment.
On the one hand, we have Cameron saying there's absolutely no intention to review current time limits, and on the other he, Theresa May and Maria Miller (Minister for Women) saying they'd "personally" like to see a reduction in time limits from 24 to 20 weeks and James Hunt saying "personally" he'd like to see 12 weeks. So what's going on there then?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.