Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Electrolysis
with every available resource show the importance of the concept of MOLE to electrolysis.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by favy2008. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Honestly you are gonna have to read a txtbk before automatically posting this sortof thing
start with univalent half equations see one above - silver wd begood Ag
use yr txtbk version of m = zIt - m is mass, I is current and t is time
realise that It is also quantity of charge - coulombs - in appropriate units (SI or MKS)
do a second example with a divalent ion - Calcium, Ca++ or Cu++ or Fe++ or -
realise that now with two ='s you need twice the charge for the same amount of molecules
do a third with aluminium - yeah correct trivalent Al+++
so it is a third of the numberr of mols/moles in ex one
god I used to find electrochemistry tedious
and depending on the units of z - yr answer is in gm or kg or moles
and to convertone to the other you have to divide by the atomic wt of th metal
and I think that is a basic skeletion.......
the problem os asking us olds in this particular branch
is that we were taught in things called equivalents
wh is confusing and you definitely dont need
{ The other thing is terminology wh you just as well get right from the start....
remember that metals dont really have a mol wt: something like Ag has an atomic weight ( erm same thing buyt silver does not go around in molecules)
NaCl which is ionic doesnt have a mol wt either because it never goes around as a molecule - THAT has a gm ionic wt (same calculation - 58.5 I think). I think you are getting the message - mol wt is only to be used for erm molecules. ]
start with univalent half equations see one above - silver wd begood Ag
use yr txtbk version of m = zIt - m is mass, I is current and t is time
realise that It is also quantity of charge - coulombs - in appropriate units (SI or MKS)
do a second example with a divalent ion - Calcium, Ca++ or Cu++ or Fe++ or -
realise that now with two ='s you need twice the charge for the same amount of molecules
do a third with aluminium - yeah correct trivalent Al+++
so it is a third of the numberr of mols/moles in ex one
god I used to find electrochemistry tedious
and depending on the units of z - yr answer is in gm or kg or moles
and to convertone to the other you have to divide by the atomic wt of th metal
and I think that is a basic skeletion.......
the problem os asking us olds in this particular branch
is that we were taught in things called equivalents
wh is confusing and you definitely dont need
{ The other thing is terminology wh you just as well get right from the start....
remember that metals dont really have a mol wt: something like Ag has an atomic weight ( erm same thing buyt silver does not go around in molecules)
NaCl which is ionic doesnt have a mol wt either because it never goes around as a molecule - THAT has a gm ionic wt (same calculation - 58.5 I think). I think you are getting the message - mol wt is only to be used for erm molecules. ]