If Tony Blair's silence on Leo's MMR means he hasn't had it, how can the government justify the pressure they out on parents to give this their babies - one law for them...?
It doesn't inspire confidence does it? I respect his right to privacy but the government have made such a song and dance about this MMR jab that one would imagine if he publicly admitted to Leo having had it, then it would encourage others.By refusing to answer he is only adding fuel to the fire.People don't trust the government as it is.
He's probably going through the same as most parents - we may recognise that the MMR is for the general good, but we don't want our precious baby to be the one who has a bad reaction. Ther fear continues, no matter how much research is paraded in front of us.