News2 mins ago
Best Way To Trace The Image Archive Of The Company Below
Hi all,
this relates to a single image ariel photograph that I have lost,I believe the company no longer exists but suspect their archive of images would probably have been sold to another company,this is quite urgent so any help please ?
Aerofilms
Gate studios
Borehamwood
Herts.
WD6 1EJ These are the image details I think.
Enfield. HSL.UK.LONDON
1962 F238 RUN 16
No.1143
Thank you in anticipation.
this relates to a single image ariel photograph that I have lost,I believe the company no longer exists but suspect their archive of images would probably have been sold to another company,this is quite urgent so any help please ?
Aerofilms
Gate studios
Borehamwood
Herts.
WD6 1EJ These are the image details I think.
Enfield. HSL.UK.LONDON
1962 F238 RUN 16
No.1143
Thank you in anticipation.
Answers
It's a l-o-n-g shot but look on this page https:// www. google. co. uk/ search? um= 1& hl= en& amp; newwindow= 1& amp; tbo= d& biw= 1163& bih= 799& amp; tbm= isch& amp; oq= Aerofilms+ LONDON+ 1962++& gs_ l= img. 12... 6716. 6716. 0. 7416. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 42. 42. 1. 1. 0... 0. 0... 1c. 1. 2. img. pmRwWcv12AY& q= Aerofilms% 20LONDON% 201962
10:09 Thu 07th Feb 2013
If your question is in any way related to this earlier question of yours, I think you are on a hiding-to-nothing.
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/Law/ Civil/Q uestion 1190994 .html
I never answered your earlier question (above) about when OS started using aerial mapping data because I don't know. At a guess it is probably in the sixties.
I suspect this is something to do with you representing yourself in a legal case over land boundaries - and the relevant dates seem to go back a long way. If you want a general comment on what you are seeking to do, then you could post a few salient facts as an answerto this. I provided some remarks about the difference between legal boundaries (as shown by the LR and on title deed plans) and how this compares to a physical boundary between two parcels of land on the ground here:
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/Law/ Civil/Q uestion 1213320 .html
Your case also seems to involve a claim for adverse possession over some aspect of the boundary.
If you don't want to go into details, perhaps at least tell us how wide a strip of land you are dealing with here.
http://
I never answered your earlier question (above) about when OS started using aerial mapping data because I don't know. At a guess it is probably in the sixties.
I suspect this is something to do with you representing yourself in a legal case over land boundaries - and the relevant dates seem to go back a long way. If you want a general comment on what you are seeking to do, then you could post a few salient facts as an answerto this. I provided some remarks about the difference between legal boundaries (as shown by the LR and on title deed plans) and how this compares to a physical boundary between two parcels of land on the ground here:
http://
Your case also seems to involve a claim for adverse possession over some aspect of the boundary.
If you don't want to go into details, perhaps at least tell us how wide a strip of land you are dealing with here.
The Companies House website says that Aerofilms Ltd submitted accounts to the end of 2011, but showing that the company is dormant.
That means that someone at their registered office should have some form of contact. Try writing to
Aerofilms Ltd,
The Astrolabe,
Cheddar Business Park,
Wedmore Road,
Cheddar,
Somerset
BS27 3EB
That means that someone at their registered office should have some form of contact. Try writing to
Aerofilms Ltd,
The Astrolabe,
Cheddar Business Park,
Wedmore Road,
Cheddar,
Somerset
BS27 3EB
Once again,thank you all on this one,wolf63 was the answer that,once extrapolated led me to the 'Bluesky' archive where what I sought now resides.Buildersmate,once again 'on the ball' I see,for which I'm glad.Unfortunately the posts from me are related and even the 'criminal' ones that were the precursor for this civil case of '09 origin.I did say in reply to (a thank you) your answer to my last posting that I'm not representing myself although sometimes it does feel that way.I do read your regular posted reply's to questions that to me seem accurate.My last post was more to ascertain if I could adduce 'adverse' to the existing case as a default setting since,in my opinion evidence to support this is more abundant and accurate,than the vagaries of the 1925 map lines.(given consent I can adduce apparently) The strip of land is 20m x 2m incidentally,but as is often said,size doesn't matter.If you saw the video of how they effected possession of our land it might surprise you,you're welcome but I'm not that hot on computers.I'll have to sign off now 'cause I'm on the school run at 9am. zzzzzzzzzzzzz
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.