Arts & Literature1 min ago
Joint Savings.
6 Answers
If I had a savings account with £500,000 ( i wish) and i added my son onto the account, would she automatically keep £250,000 if i died?
If she did, would she pay inheritance tax or CGT on the money?
If she did, would she pay inheritance tax or CGT on the money?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by pretty_snowdrop. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Your son appears to have gender issues, Pretty-Snowdrop ;-)
CGT isn't relevant because there's no capital gain to be taxed.
The IHT rules say that money placed into a joint account solely by the deceased person counts wholly towards the value of the estate. See here
http:// www.hmr c.gov.u k/inher itancet ax/how- to-valu e-estat e/joint -proper ty.htm# 3
and here:
http:// www.mar sdenraw sthorn. com/law -news/2 396/Joi nt_acco unt_can _cause_ inherit ance_ta x_probl ems
Chris
CGT isn't relevant because there's no capital gain to be taxed.
The IHT rules say that money placed into a joint account solely by the deceased person counts wholly towards the value of the estate. See here
http://
and here:
http://
Chris
There is another link on Law - BuenChic may be able to locate
the account on death of one party is still operable by the other - which is convenient because sole accounts are frozen and unusable on death until probate is granted
however - altho each party can draw on the funds - the ownership is partitioned (divided) as to who contributed - see BuenChic
this is as a result of a recent ish case
rather obvious really - but defeated my family for one.
With spouses who are usually the joint owners - this doesnt really arise as transfer between spouses (but not parent and child) are IHT- free
simples
the account on death of one party is still operable by the other - which is convenient because sole accounts are frozen and unusable on death until probate is granted
however - altho each party can draw on the funds - the ownership is partitioned (divided) as to who contributed - see BuenChic
this is as a result of a recent ish case
rather obvious really - but defeated my family for one.
With spouses who are usually the joint owners - this doesnt really arise as transfer between spouses (but not parent and child) are IHT- free
simples