ChatterBank2 mins ago
Logistics on lorries: Misuse of word?
Are transporters and delivery companies guilty of adopting and misusing this word? 'Logistics' means "the careful organization of a complicated activity so that it happens in a successful and effective way", as in "We need to look at the logistics of the whole aid operation". Clearly, the word can apply to all sorts of operations.
It seems to me that many transport and delivery companies have hijacked the word and are seeking to gain acceptance of it as meaning nothing more than a sophisticated alternative to the transport of goods.
What does anyone else think?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Robert G. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.My beef is that it's a bit like the way the word 'media' has been hijacked from its original (pre-newspapers, pre-radio. pre-television) meaning. When people refer to the press media they now merely say 'the media'. It's too general a term. We are already in danger of using the word in it's earlier sense and then being misunderstood by others who are ignorant of that earlier sense.
Thanks for those, BriWrite. I know languages evolve continually, or even continuously, but rather than hijack existing words and then misuse them, why don't people invent new ones, or create derived ones, like most people? Take' Pedestrianisation' of a highway, for example: ie converting a trafficked road into a way for pedestrians only. I don't have a problem with that because its meaning is pretty obvious.
More examples of widespread misuse would be nice to see here.
I like seedless grapes. But what about the other ones? Supermarkets tend to label them seeded grapes. It makes them sound as if someone's put seeds into them - or as if they're playing at Wimbledon.
Robert, I think part of the way management speak works is a love of long words - logistics sounds better than transport because it's longer. And putting Solutions on the end of anything is the latest buzzword. (Once you're aware of it you'll see it on lots of trucks.) The expectation is possibly that the listener won't really know what they're talking about.
Hows this for management speak?
A male of unspecified nationality in collaboration with his female companion proceeded towards the apex of a natural geological protuberance. The sole purpose of their expedition was the procurement of a quantity of fluid, hydride of oxygen.
On gathering the aforementioned fluid it was to be accumulated within the confines of a retentive vessel of unspecified dimensions. It is unclear whether this assignment was completed or not as regrettably the masculine member of the team met with an unfortunate catastrophe.
This resulted in him precipitously descending headlong back from whence he had came, sustaining severe damage to the upper cranial portion of his anatomical structure; Subsequently in order to offer assistance to her companion the second member of the team unselfishly performed a rotational translation, oriented in the same direction as the one taken by her colleague.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.