ChatterBank1 min ago
When Is The Right Time For Sex Education?
98 Answers
A pal of mine has just told me his son has been given sex education at the age of 9. Now he's using what he's learnt to ask embarrasing questions to all and sundry and is in all sorts of trouble in school and with relatives generally and cannot understand why. I remember sex education at the age of approx 13-14. Surely 9 is far too young to get a proper grasp of this difficult subject so why are primary school childreen being burdened so young?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.We took our Biology master apart in Lower Sixth, a bachelor with the nickname of "Scruff," the class turning totally innocent on what reproduction was all about......right bastards we were it must be said. For me, it was a lesson from the headmaster at 11, three of us having gone to the headmaster about the second master who had been taking photos of one of our friends in the garages in a high state of nudity.
There were also a number of other 'incidents'.....
There were also a number of other 'incidents'.....
I can't see why people get so hung up about body parts. I imagine that a child knows what it's toes are and it's eyes are and it's armpits are by the age of nine. Why then should they have the knowledge of what their reproductive organs are called kept from them? That instills an air of secrecy and something to be ashamed of, and as such doesn't that leave children wide open to an abusive adult capitalising on that instilled shame? I'm sure no harm ever came from a little girl or boy knowing clitoris' have a proper name.
My seven year old know she has ears but can't name all the bones inside them. If a parent wants their seven year old to know the name of every part of the body, fine, that's up them but I don't want a school making that decision for me. My seven year doesn't need to know that level of detail of any part of the body at the moment. I think some people go too far either way - those that pretend sex doesn't happen and those who arm their children with too much information at too young an age.
There's three of them - http:// www.bri tannica .com/EB checked /topic/ 42604/e ar-bone
I recall getting taught sex lessons during the first year of secondary school and thinking how stupid it was then since we didn't get told anything we didn't already know. Embarassing also. (I also recall being told we all HAD to ask a question so I thought of one and didn't get a very satisfactory answer. I don't think the teacher knew as much biology as they thought. I recall thinking why did they insist on a question if they couldn't answer them anyway.)
So based on that experience from decades ago I'd suspect if it is to be of any use it should, latest, be the last year of primary school, which would be 11. 10 might be ok. 9 is possibly slightly young but if you wish folk to treat the subject as a normal part of life and not something to be embarrassed about, I can see why it might be considered. But yes, maybe a little young to be force fed the information rather than have questions honestly answered.
So based on that experience from decades ago I'd suspect if it is to be of any use it should, latest, be the last year of primary school, which would be 11. 10 might be ok. 9 is possibly slightly young but if you wish folk to treat the subject as a normal part of life and not something to be embarrassed about, I can see why it might be considered. But yes, maybe a little young to be force fed the information rather than have questions honestly answered.
-- answer removed --