News3 mins ago
Brilliant News!
28 Answers
At long last it appears a tougher line is going to be taken:
http:// uk.news .yahoo. com/tex ting-dr ivers-f ace-90- fine-04 4525107 .html#o IF5XnI
As I began reading this I feared that one of the most important issues was going to be ignored yet again but, further in the article, there it is. Drivers WILL BE FINED for hogging the middle lane of the motorway. About damn time!
http://
As I began reading this I feared that one of the most important issues was going to be ignored yet again but, further in the article, there it is. Drivers WILL BE FINED for hogging the middle lane of the motorway. About damn time!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anaxcrosswords. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//because the inner lane is mainly used by vehicles joining or leaving the motorway...//
another example of the authorities not enforcing rules that already exist. in the UK, the rule of the road is give way to the right, not to the left. so traffic joining the motorway does not have priority over traffic already in lane 1; nor is traffic in lane 1 required to give way to joining traffic, nor to move to the right to afford joining traffic space to join.
another example of the authorities not enforcing rules that already exist. in the UK, the rule of the road is give way to the right, not to the left. so traffic joining the motorway does not have priority over traffic already in lane 1; nor is traffic in lane 1 required to give way to joining traffic, nor to move to the right to afford joining traffic space to join.
Difficult to police, no one will think they will get caught, so little additional deterrence. Zero tolerance is no way to treat other human beings, no reasonable person wishes to live in a totalitarian state. Since motorway speeds are obviously believed to be too low by the majority, given the percentage who drive above them, is this just a ruse to get more money from the public and justify it be trotting out the old, 'you didn't have to disobey us so we're pretending its voluntary', mantra ?