ChatterBank1 min ago
Should The 'angels Of Woolwich' Get An Award For Bravery?
I can't think of a good reason why not.
Can anyone?
http:// www.sta ndard.c o.uk/ne ws/lond on/give -woolwi ch-ange ls-meda l-for-b ravery- 8644819 .html
Can anyone?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't believe lives need to be saved for someone to show outstanding bravery, often with disregard for their own safety.
These women had no idea what may have happened to them in the face of guys with knifes and guns.
They chose to comfort a dying man, and reason with two murderers..........it doesn't come much braver in my opinion. Most would have run away as fast as they could (me included).
These women had no idea what may have happened to them in the face of guys with knifes and guns.
They chose to comfort a dying man, and reason with two murderers..........it doesn't come much braver in my opinion. Most would have run away as fast as they could (me included).
I can think of a few
They didnt tackle the men with an award in their minds
(unlike the countless time servers and placemen who move not their asses unless a pay rise is in the offing)
They may not wish to be seen to be in the same basket as
time servers, faceless bureaucrats and party donors
party lobbysits, adulterers and perjurors
The issue with gongs nowadays is that one has to 'earn them' so step forward countless faceless eurocrats who have battled long and hard often in foreign languages over the clotted cream schedules
I went off ginging and gonging when I heard that the Honours Committee was agonising over whether Nobel prize winners deserved the very hard-to-earn honours they themselves had. [given themselves]
They didnt tackle the men with an award in their minds
(unlike the countless time servers and placemen who move not their asses unless a pay rise is in the offing)
They may not wish to be seen to be in the same basket as
time servers, faceless bureaucrats and party donors
party lobbysits, adulterers and perjurors
The issue with gongs nowadays is that one has to 'earn them' so step forward countless faceless eurocrats who have battled long and hard often in foreign languages over the clotted cream schedules
I went off ginging and gonging when I heard that the Honours Committee was agonising over whether Nobel prize winners deserved the very hard-to-earn honours they themselves had. [given themselves]
Here's why I think they deserve an award (bear with me...it's a bit convoluted)...
It's not so much for their bravery, although they did show admirable selflessness...it's because we (or perhaps just I) need something cathartic to come out of this.
When someone acts so inhumanely, we (I) need something to tell us, "There IS good in the human spirit".
What these fine women did is the polar opposite of what they saw.
They not only comforted Lee Rigby, but by extension, the rest of us.
Does that make sense?
It's not so much for their bravery, although they did show admirable selflessness...it's because we (or perhaps just I) need something cathartic to come out of this.
When someone acts so inhumanely, we (I) need something to tell us, "There IS good in the human spirit".
What these fine women did is the polar opposite of what they saw.
They not only comforted Lee Rigby, but by extension, the rest of us.
Does that make sense?
Don't forget that these two murderers were still armed with their knives/cleavers/machetes at the time that 'The Angels Of Woolwich' made their stand.
They couldn't have been sure that neither of the fruit-loops would take it into their tiny minds to attack them or any other bystanders.......and yet they still behaved with great compassion and dignity.
Perhaps in some small part they *did* prevent additional loss of life? And even if they didn't I couldn't think of two more worthy recipients for 'any' gong going.
They couldn't have been sure that neither of the fruit-loops would take it into their tiny minds to attack them or any other bystanders.......and yet they still behaved with great compassion and dignity.
Perhaps in some small part they *did* prevent additional loss of life? And even if they didn't I couldn't think of two more worthy recipients for 'any' gong going.
Takes all sorts, Peter, but these women were plucky.
Personally, I'd never pass someone in distress by. I've helped out more than once with elderly people. One had fallen and ended up with a broken hip, the other collapsed with a heart attack behind the wheel. I still remember the lovely letter his wife sent, thanking me for helping. Unfortunately he died, but still, I tried to help and that was appreciated.
Personally, I'd never pass someone in distress by. I've helped out more than once with elderly people. One had fallen and ended up with a broken hip, the other collapsed with a heart attack behind the wheel. I still remember the lovely letter his wife sent, thanking me for helping. Unfortunately he died, but still, I tried to help and that was appreciated.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.