Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Can't Think Of A Title - Brain Gone Fishing .....
I know that what this guy did was OTT and he is being punished for this. But I am sure, at some stage in our working life, we have thought about doing this. Note the guys surname.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-brist ol-2305 1603
.
http://
.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by wolf63. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Blimey Volfie - you are surrounded by goodie-goodies whose life sum of naughtiness is recording Coronation St without permission
or perhaps just thinking about it....
Yeah I have never been drawn to criminal damage for fear of being made to pay for it. This started early with dinner damage during my days in the Bullingdon Klub in Oxford along with our Prime Minister and Mayor of London.
OK I am Cambridge but you know what I mean.
This is one of the reasons why I dont key cars either....
or perhaps just thinking about it....
Yeah I have never been drawn to criminal damage for fear of being made to pay for it. This started early with dinner damage during my days in the Bullingdon Klub in Oxford along with our Prime Minister and Mayor of London.
OK I am Cambridge but you know what I mean.
This is one of the reasons why I dont key cars either....
Oh, thinking about it,
yeah certainly up to and including bunny-boiling
The name ? Yeah that's good !
Am I the only person to notice the appropriate name of
Cynthia 'Sin' Bowers, lately of the CQC who resigned previously ?
Just think if she got knighted as a lot of health administrators do of varying quality, then, as she's currently out of a job she could become self employed as Lady Sin.....
yeah certainly up to and including bunny-boiling
The name ? Yeah that's good !
Am I the only person to notice the appropriate name of
Cynthia 'Sin' Bowers, lately of the CQC who resigned previously ?
Just think if she got knighted as a lot of health administrators do of varying quality, then, as she's currently out of a job she could become self employed as Lady Sin.....
Times have changed. Years ago,judges regarded burglary at some wealthy person's home as worth 7 years; it could have been the judge's own home; but some working class innocent being slashed from ear to ear as worth about 12 months; no son of a judge, nor the judge, was likely to suffer that attack.
Now it is all reversed. Anyone who attacked a human with a hammer and inflicted that degree of damage would be looking at 5 years plus but the burglar might get 12 months.
Now it is all reversed. Anyone who attacked a human with a hammer and inflicted that degree of damage would be looking at 5 years plus but the burglar might get 12 months.
While in no way condoning what this chap did, I do think that a 20 month jail sentence, along with the restraining order, somewhat harsh.
/// The restraining order will prevent Crook from contacting former and current staff at Bristol Flying Centre or visiting the premises on his release. ///
Surely this is a violation of his 'human rights, i am not talking about Harassing former or current staff at the Flying centre, but how can anyone be ordered from talking or continuing a previous friendship with ex work mates?
/// The restraining order will prevent Crook from contacting former and current staff at Bristol Flying Centre or visiting the premises on his release. ///
Surely this is a violation of his 'human rights, i am not talking about Harassing former or current staff at the Flying centre, but how can anyone be ordered from talking or continuing a previous friendship with ex work mates?
20 months is harsh but it was a very extreme case of criminal damage!
Human Rights only apply to governments - you can't sue a private individual or company for breaching your human rights.
Personally I think if this was changed we might see some very positive benefits but at the moment thats what we have.
For example state run OAP homes have been sued for breach of the human rights of their residents but private homes are immune from such prosecutions
Human Rights only apply to governments - you can't sue a private individual or company for breaching your human rights.
Personally I think if this was changed we might see some very positive benefits but at the moment thats what we have.
For example state run OAP homes have been sued for breach of the human rights of their residents but private homes are immune from such prosecutions
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.