ChatterBank1 min ago
Princess Di. New 'evidence'?
58 Answers
No details at the moment but very intriguing.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -237414 83
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Zacs-Master. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I drove through the same tunnel in Paris that Diana died in, only 3 weeks after the accident in 1997. Anyone driving much above 30-40 mph at that point was driving very dangerously indeed.
Diana died because the driver of her limo was going at a stupidly fast speed and she wasn't wearing a seat belt. There were 4 people in limo that day and the only one who survived, was the only one wearing a seat belt.
There was no conspiracy in the same way that Elvis isn't still alive and working in a Walmart in Nowheresville, USA.
Why can't people just accept that and move on ?
Diana died because the driver of her limo was going at a stupidly fast speed and she wasn't wearing a seat belt. There were 4 people in limo that day and the only one who survived, was the only one wearing a seat belt.
There was no conspiracy in the same way that Elvis isn't still alive and working in a Walmart in Nowheresville, USA.
Why can't people just accept that and move on ?
AOG, Mr al-Fayed claimed that his son,Dodi, and Princess Diana, were killed on the orders of the Royal Family, Prince Philip being being prime among them. The murder was one large conspiracy to kill both because Dodi was a Muslim, the couple were engaged, and the Royal Family did not want a Muslim married to Diana, whom he believed may well have pregnant our already. The killing was to be set up by our military and secret agencies
.
Now, the present story is that Diana was killed by the military. It is the same story revisited; why would the military want her dead? On whose orders? On whose behalf?
It is absurd, but it is reasonable to ask, as I did, sarcastically and humorously, whether the story continues with the claim, made before, that Prince Philip was behind the murder !
Now, tell us all AOG, what is there to be ashamed of in that?
.
Now, the present story is that Diana was killed by the military. It is the same story revisited; why would the military want her dead? On whose orders? On whose behalf?
It is absurd, but it is reasonable to ask, as I did, sarcastically and humorously, whether the story continues with the claim, made before, that Prince Philip was behind the murder !
Now, tell us all AOG, what is there to be ashamed of in that?
Fred...not sure why you are berated here ? The stupid person who owns Harrods has spent the last few years accusing Prince Philip of being responsible for his sons death, so I am at a loss to understand why your tongue-in-cheek comment was pounced upon.
Can't we leave Diana to rest in peace ? I am far from being a Royalist but I feel so sorry for her two sons.
Enough already.
Can't we leave Diana to rest in peace ? I am far from being a Royalist but I feel so sorry for her two sons.
Enough already.