ChatterBank2 mins ago
Do We Have A Lot Tho Thank James Blunt For? - Or Should He Have Been Court Marshalled?
16 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Nice spin but it was General Sir Mike Jackson who was taking the heat, not his underlings, for his own apparent refusal to follow a direct order. In any event it was the MoD that blocked British involvement in the proposed action.
...'When Clark said that I was resisting his orders, Shelton suggested that he had an "authority problem".
Clark called me back into the room. "Mike, do you understand that as a Nato commander I'm giving you a legal order, and if you don't accept that order you'll have to resign your position and get out of the chain of command?"
"Saceur, I do."
"OK. I'm giving you an order to block the runways at Pristina airfield. I want it done. Is that clear?"
Saceur was insistent, despite the risk of a confrontation with the Russians. I suggested that armoured vehicles would be better suited to blocking the runways than helicopters, in the almost certain knowledge that the UK would decline such a provocative move. Clark agreed that the vehicles would be preferable.
I went out to pass the order for 4 (UK) Armoured Brigade to place a combat team on short notice to move to the airfield, knowing that it would be referred for national approval.
I returned to the room and reported to Clark that I had given the warning order. He tried to change the subject, but I wasn't prepared to leave it there.
"Saceur, you're just testing me, aren't you? You don't really want me to do this, do you?"
He denied any such motive. After a little more discussion I left again to check on what was happening. London had played the red card. British forces would not be allowed to block the runway as Clark insisted.'
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/wor ldnews/ 1562161 /Gen-Si r-Mike- Jackson -My-cla sh-with -Nato-c hief.ht ml
Reports at the time did appear despite the lack of any pop star connection.
http:// www.nyt imes.co m/1999/ 09/10/w orld/us -genera l-was-o verrule d-in-ko sovo.ht ml
...'When Clark said that I was resisting his orders, Shelton suggested that he had an "authority problem".
Clark called me back into the room. "Mike, do you understand that as a Nato commander I'm giving you a legal order, and if you don't accept that order you'll have to resign your position and get out of the chain of command?"
"Saceur, I do."
"OK. I'm giving you an order to block the runways at Pristina airfield. I want it done. Is that clear?"
Saceur was insistent, despite the risk of a confrontation with the Russians. I suggested that armoured vehicles would be better suited to blocking the runways than helicopters, in the almost certain knowledge that the UK would decline such a provocative move. Clark agreed that the vehicles would be preferable.
I went out to pass the order for 4 (UK) Armoured Brigade to place a combat team on short notice to move to the airfield, knowing that it would be referred for national approval.
I returned to the room and reported to Clark that I had given the warning order. He tried to change the subject, but I wasn't prepared to leave it there.
"Saceur, you're just testing me, aren't you? You don't really want me to do this, do you?"
He denied any such motive. After a little more discussion I left again to check on what was happening. London had played the red card. British forces would not be allowed to block the runway as Clark insisted.'
http://
Reports at the time did appear despite the lack of any pop star connection.
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.