Shopping & Style0 min ago
Another U-Turn By Dave
http://
Another u-turn it would seem. When Labour said that are going to do this after they win the 2015 election, Dave said that it was a con, but now he thinks its a good idea. A conversion on the road to Damascus perhaps ? Welcome anyway of course.
Another u-turn it would seem. When Labour said that are going to do this after they win the 2015 election, Dave said that it was a con, but now he thinks its a good idea. A conversion on the road to Damascus perhaps ? Welcome anyway of course.
Answers
http://
10:23 Fri 29th Nov 2013
YMB, you claim, "This is a coalition. By definition this will lead to conflict of opinion and hence 'U-turns'."
I totally disagree! With a coalition government, the "conflict of opinion" should obviously take place when the coalition partners are discussing in private what their policies are going to be and NOT after they have decided and made these public. Surely that's perfectly obvious.
I totally disagree! With a coalition government, the "conflict of opinion" should obviously take place when the coalition partners are discussing in private what their policies are going to be and NOT after they have decided and made these public. Surely that's perfectly obvious.
Quiz, perhaps this answers you ? And from the pages of your favorite left wing rag. Rather looks like the BBC jumped the gun.
http://
No 10 says it has not asked Big Six energy firms to freeze prices
http://
No 10 says it has not asked Big Six energy firms to freeze prices
ymb...its all a bit of a mystery then, because this appeared on this mornings BBC news website ;;;
http://
http://
YMB, perhaps you didn't notice the following phrases in your very own link...
"No 10 says...Cameron's spokesman dismisses...No 10 aide dismissed...Downing Street said..." and so forth.
Guess where all these denials originated. Have a look at Mikey's link, too.
You might also care to answer the point I presented to you in my contribution made at 11.10 on the 29th about how obvious it is that coalition partners should air their differences IN PRIVATE and BEFORE policy is declared rather than u-turning on average every month afterwards.
"No 10 says...Cameron's spokesman dismisses...No 10 aide dismissed...Downing Street said..." and so forth.
Guess where all these denials originated. Have a look at Mikey's link, too.
You might also care to answer the point I presented to you in my contribution made at 11.10 on the 29th about how obvious it is that coalition partners should air their differences IN PRIVATE and BEFORE policy is declared rather than u-turning on average every month afterwards.
